Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic and psychiatric diagnostic differences between consumers for whom the metabolic monitoring form had and had not been used

From: Use of an electronic metabolic monitoring form in a mental health service – a retrospective file audit

 

Total sample (n = 721)

Form used (n = 261)

Form not used (n = 460)

Effect size

p value

Age, mean (SD) years

41.4 (14.6)

41.4 (14.3)

41.5 (14.8)

d = 0.01

.902

Sex

   

φ = .12

.001

 Males, n (%)

421 (58.4)

175 (41.6)

246 (58.4)

  

 Females, n (%)

300 (41.6)

89 (29.7)

211 (70.3)

  

Diagnosis (ICD-10)a

   

Cramer’s V = .27

<.001

 Schizophrenia (F20), n (%)

305 (42.3)

159 (60.7)

146 (33.1)

  

 Bipolar disorder (F31), n (%)

84 (11.7)

23 (27.4)

61 (72.6)

  

 Depressive disorders (F32, F33), n (%)

81 (11.2)

17 (21.0)

64 (79.0)

  

 Anxiety disorders (F41), n (%)

40 (5.5)

7 (17.5)

33 (82.5)

  

 Other, n (%)

193 (26.8)

56 (29.0)

137 (71.0)

  
  1. aDiagnosis data were missing for 18 (2.5 %) consumers
  2. SD standard deviation; ICD- 10