Skip to main content

Table 3 Analyses of the discrimination power of HCL-32 and its sub-domains in screening BDs

From: Investigation of the clinical utility of the hypomania checklist 32 (HCL-32) for the screening of bipolar disorders in the non-clinical adult population

Ā 

HCL-32 total

Active/elated

Irritable/risk-taking

BD1 vs Control

ā€ƒAUC (95Ā % CI)

0.56 (0.51ā€“0.61)

0.52 (0.47ā€“0.57)

0.67 (0.62ā€“0.72)

ā€ƒoptimal cut-off score

>19

ā‰„12

>2

ā€ƒPPV (%)

38.87 (28.89ā€“49.60)

29.72 (23.42ā€“36.65)

37.96 (31.07ā€“45.24)

ā€ƒNPV (%)

77.72 (72.22ā€“81.52)

76.53 (70.50ā€“81.86)

83.20 (77.77ā€“87.76)

ā€ƒsensitivity (95Ā % CI)

0.32 (0.24ā€“0.42)

0.52 (0.42ā€“0.62)

0.65 (0.55ā€“0.74)

ā€ƒspecificity (95Ā % CI)

0.82 (0.77ā€“0.86)

0.56 (0.50ā€“0.62)

0.62 (0.56ā€“0.67)

BD2 vs Control

ā€ƒAUC

0.64 (0.60ā€“0.69)

0.54 (0.49ā€“0.59)

0.75 (0.70ā€“0.79)

ā€ƒoptimal cut-off score

>21

>11

>2

ā€ƒPPV (%)

53.84 (43.54ā€“71.23)

27.20 (22.06ā€“32.84)

37.63 (30.82ā€“44.81)

ā€ƒNPV (%)

81.31 (76.95ā€“85.17)

83.27 (76.12ā€“88.99)

88.50 (83.60ā€“92.36)

ā€ƒsensitivity (95Ā % CI)

0.31 (0.22ā€“0.40)

0.76 (0.66ā€“0.83)

0.74 (0.64ā€“0.82)

ā€ƒspecificity (95Ā % CI)

0.93 (0.90ā€“0.96)

0.37 (0.32ā€“0.43)

0.62 (0.56ā€“0.67)

BDs vs Control

ā€ƒAUC

0.60 (0.56ā€“0.65)

0.51 (0.47ā€“0.56)

0.71 (0.67ā€“0.75)

ā€ƒoptimal cut-off score

>19

>10

>2

ā€ƒPPV (%)

58.44 (49.66ā€“66.83)

43.31 (38.28ā€“48.46)

56.07 (49.94ā€“62.07)

ā€ƒNPV (%)

64.57 (59.65ā€“69.28)

63.82 (55.64ā€“71.45)

73.99 (68.24ā€“79.19)

ā€ƒsensitivity (95Ā % CI)

0.36 (0.30ā€“0.43)

0.75 (0.68ā€“0.80)

0.69 (0.62ā€“0.75)

ā€ƒspecificity (95Ā % CI)

0.82 (0.77ā€“0.86)

0.31 (0.26ā€“0.37)

0.62 (0.56ā€“0.67)

  1. Cut-off score with the highest Youdenā€™s Index value
  2. AUC the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, HCL-32 hypomania checklist 32, BD1 bipolar I disorder, BD2 bipolar II disorder, BDs bipolar disorders, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value