Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis

From: The incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder among survivors after earthquakes:a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Study design

Region

Richer scale

Questionnaire

Clinical interview

Time after earthquake (month)

Victims with PTSD

Total sample size

Quality evaluation

Wu et al [22]

2006

Cross-sectional

Chi-Chi,Taiwan

7.3

NO

MINI

36

18

405

5

Chou et al [23]

2005

Cross-sectional

Chi-Chi,Taiwan

7.3

NO

MINI

6

35

442

6

Flores et al [24]

2014

Cross-sectional

Pisco, Peru

7.9

PCL-C

NO

48

161

1012

6

Kadak et al [25]

2013

Cross-sectional

Van, Turkey

7.2

CPTSD-RI

NO

6

295

725

5

Zhou et al [26]

2015

Cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

12

224

817

5

Emin et al [27]

2006

Cross-sectional

Marma, Turkey

7.4

TSSC

NO

36

131

683

5

Metin et al [28]

2004

Cross-sectional

Marma, Turkey

7.4

TSSC

NO

14

177

950

6

Zhang et al [29]

2015

Cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

60

63

684

6

Peng et al [30]

2009

Cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

HTQ

NO

2.5

251

447

7

Roussos et al [31]

2005

Cross-sectional

Ano Liosia, Greece

5.9

PTSD-RI

NO

3

87

1937

4

Jude et al [32]

2015

Cross-sectional

Haiti

7.0

IES-R

NO

30

322

872

5

Fu et al [33]

2013

Cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

12

420

2987

5

Hsu et al [34]

2002

Cross-sectional

Chi-Chi,Taiwan

7.3

NO

ChIPS

1.5

70

323

7

Jia et al [35]

2015

Cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

CPSS

NO

12

179

631

5

Tian et al [36]

2014

Cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

SCID

36

261

4604

6

Wang et al [37]

2013

Cross-sectional

Yingjiang, China

5.8

CPSS

NO

1

445

1198

4

Zhang et al [38]

2015

Longitudinal study

Lushan, China

7.0

CRIES

NO

3

834

2229

5

       

6

556

2299

 

Cem et al [39]

2013

Cross-sectional

Konya, Turkey

4.3

CPTSD-RI

NO

6

110

450

7

Chan et al [40]

2011

Cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

IES-R

NO

7.5

526

1725

5

Fan et al [41]

2011

Cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PTSD-SS

NO

6

329

2081

6

Guo et al [42]

2014

Longitudinal study

Wenchuan, China

8.0

IES-R

NO

2

620

1066

6

       

8

297

1344

 
       

14

239

1210

 
       

26

223

1174

 
       

44

102

1281

 

Jia et al [43]

2013

Longitudinal study

Wenchuan, China

8.0

CPTSD-RI

NO

15

74

596

7

       

36

46

430

 

Ying et al [44]

2013

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

CPSS

NO

12

262

3052

5

Xu et al [45]

2011

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL

NO

12

835

2080

6

Ali et al [46]

2012

cross-sectional

Kashmir, Pakistan

7.6

DTS

NO

30

124

300

5

Ayub et al [47]

2012

cross-sectional

Kashmir, Pakistan

7.6

CRIES

NO

18

699

1078

6

Jude et al [48]

2014

cross-sectional

Haiti

7.0

IES-R

NO

30

498

1355

6

Gigantesco et al [49]

2013

cross-sectional

L’Aquila, Italy

6.3

NO

Mini

12

39

957

7

Liu et al [50]

2010

Longitudinal study

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

4

165

1474

6

       

6

129

1474

 
       

9

100

1474

 
       

12

84

1474

 

Naeem et al [51]

2011

cross-sectional

Kashmir, Pakistan

7.6

TSSC

NO

18

601

1291

7

Parvaresh et al [52]

2009

cross-sectional

Bam,Iran

6.3

NO

Watson interview

4

182

433

5

Takeda et al [53]

2013

cross-sectional

Great East Japan

9.0

IES-R

NO

9

118

1180

5

Wang et al [54]

2011

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PTSD-SS

NO

1

257

409

7

Wang et al [55]

2013

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

42

145

319

6

Wang et al [56]

2012

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

CRIES

NO

10

522

1841

7

Wen et al [57]

2012

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

36

113

2525

6

Yuqing et al [6]

2011

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

IES-R

NO

2

790

956

4

Zhang et al [5]

2012

Longitudinal study

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

6

53

548

5

       

12

7

584

 
       

18

9

548

 

Zhang et al [58]

2011

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

12

311

1181

6

Zhen et al [59]

2012

cross-sectional

Yushu, China

7.1

PCL-C

NO

3

170

505

5

Hou et al [60]

2011

Longitudinal study

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

3

613

1677

5

       

6

515

1677

 
       

9

416

1677

 
       

12

373

1677

 

Lau et al [61]

2010

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

CRIES

NO

1

741

3324

4

Liu et al [62]

2010

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

PCL-C

NO

9

346

569

6

Ying et al [63]

2014

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

CPSS

NO

12

101

788

5

Kun et al [64]

2013

cross-sectional

Wenchuan, China

8.0

HTQ

NO

3

529

1820

7

Sezgin et al [65]

2012

cross-sectional

South Eastern Turkey

6.4

PDS

NO

12

764

1253

5

  1. MINI mini international neuropsychiatric interview, PCL-C PTSD checklist-civilian version, CPTSD-RI child PTSD–reaction index, TSSC traumatic stress symptom checklist, HTQ harvard trauma questionnaire, PTSD-RI PTSD reaction index, IES-R impact of event scale-revised, ChIPS children’s interview for psychiatric syndromes, CPSS child PTSD symptom scale, SCID structured clinical interview for DSM-IV disorders, CRIES children's revised impact of event scale, PTSD-SS PTSD self-rating scale, DTS Davidson trauma scale, PCL PTSD checklist, PDS post traumatic stress diagnostic scale