Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes in global functioning (GAF), problems in interpersonal relationships (IIP) and social adjustment (SAS)

From: A randomised controlled trial of mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for patients with comorbid borderline personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder

 

GAF (DSM)

IIP total

SAS total

 

Unadjusted observed mean (SD)

Unadjusted observed mean (SD)

Unadjusted observed mean (SD)

 

MBT

SCM

t

MBT (n = 21)

SCM (n = 19)

t

MBT (n = 21)

SCM (n = 19)

t

Baseline

38.57 (n = 21)

(9.09)

39.74 (n = 19)

(8.38)

0.42

2.04

(0.62)

2.11

(0.41)

0.43

2.71

(0.41)

2.81

(0.41)

0.78

6 months

     

1.87

(0.58)

2.03

(0.40)

1.04

2.53

(0.62)

2.72

(0.49)

1.06

12 months

     

1.66

(0.51)

2.01

(0.56)

2.06*

2.05

(0.41)

2.63

(0.44)

4.31***

18 months

62.71 (n = 21)

(16.66)

51.39 (n = 18)

(12.06)

-2.39**

1.33

(0.48)

1.76

(0.44)

2.94**

1.69

(0.45)

2.27

(0.51)

3.78***

 

Adjusted model coefficients (95 % CI)

Adjusted model coefficients (95 % CI)

Adjusted model coefficients (95 % CI)

Model: Wald χ2

107.57 (df = 3)b

57.47*** (df = 3)b

82.53*** (df = 4)a

Linear change (both groups)

3.82***

(2.01, 5.63)

-0.11**

(-0.18, -0.04)

-0.22***

(-0.35, -0.10)

Quadratic change (both groups)

      

Differential linear change (MBT)

4.22**

(1.75, 6.70)

-0.13*

(-0.23, -0.03)

-0.19*

(-0.36 -0.02)

Group differences at 18 months

11.51**

(4.13, 18.89)

-0.44**

(-0.73, -0.16)

-0.60***

(-0.88, -0.33)

  1. MBT Mentalization-Based Treatment, SCM Structured Clinical Management, t t-test for independent samples, χ2 chi-squared, CI confidence interval, df: degrees of freedom
  2. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
  3. amixed-effects linear regression with random slope
  4. bmixed-effects linear regression with random intercept