Skip to main content

Table 2 Percentages (%) of subjects with no needs, met needs or unmet needs for 22 CAN domains (user's perspective) and stratified by presence/absence of metabolic syndrome

From: Perceived needs and health-related quality of life in people with schizophrenia and metabolic syndrome: a “real-world” study

All sample (N = 60)

MetS Yes vs Noc

CAN domains

No needs (%)

Met needs (%)

Unmet needs (%)

No needs (%)

Met needs (%)

Unmet needs (%)

P

1. Accommodation

95.0

3.3

1.7

-6.0

8.7

-2.7

.691

2. Food

56.7

33.3

10.0

-0.3

2.4

-2.1

.917

3. Looking after the home

45.8

44.1

10.2

-15

2.3

12.8

.120

4. Self-care

86.7

11.7

1.7

0.5

-4.8

4.3

.718

5. Daytime activitiesa

52.5

25.4

22.0

13.7

-13.2

-0.5

.516

6. Physical health

63.3

30.0

6.7

-18.1

7.8

10.3

.084

7. Psychotic symptoms

41.7

55.0

3.3

17.1

-18.7

1.6

.296

8. Informationa

85.0

11.7

1.7

-10.9

9.3

4.3

.844

9. Psychological distress

26.7

41.7

31.7

-8.0

-4.1

12.1

.325

10. Safety to self

85.0

11.7

3.3

3.2

2.2

-5.4

.491

11. Safety to others

88.3

8.3

3.3

4.8

-6.5

1.6

.788

12. Alcohol

95.0

5.0

0.0

1.1

-1.1

0.0

.856

13. Drugs

93.3

5.0

1.7

3.8

-1.1

-2.7

.466

14. Companyb

50.0

23.3

25.0

-17.7

25.6

-12.3

.265

15. Intimate relationshipsb

73.3

21.7

3.3

-13.2

7.2

1.6

.132

16. Sexual expressionb

71.7

15.0

10.0

-10.5

3.9

4.9

.526

17. Child care

96.6

3.4

0.0

5.4

-5.4

0.0

.271

18. Basic education

91.7

6.7

1.7

-0.6

3.3

-2.7

.822

19. Telephone

90.0

8.3

1.7

-4.9

7.6

-2.7

.821

20. Transport

85.0

10.0

5.0

-3.9

-2.1

6.0

.470

21. Money

68.3

23.3

8.3

-19.2

18.6

0.6

.248

22. Welfare benefits

98.3

1.7

0.0

-4.3

4.3

0.0

.205

  1. a N = 59
  2. bUnknown need status was given for each domain due to the user’s refusal to discuss the domain and it was statistically treated as No need (for further details, please consult www.researchintorecovery.com)
  3. cIndicates the difference for each possible answer (no need, met and unmet need) between patients with and without MetS. For example, for “6.Physical health”, the value -18.1% indicates that there are18.1% fewer of patients with no needs in the group with MetS than in the group without MetS