Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression analyses

From: Broader conceptualization of remission assessed by the remission from depression questionnaire and its association with symptomatic remission: a prospective, multicenter, observational study

Dependent variable categorical outcome at month 6

Independent variable score at baseline

p-value

Level/Unit

Odds Ratio

95 % CI

Remission

 HAMD-17

RDQ

0.439

Remission

0.76

0.38, 1.52

 

HAMD-17

0.009

1 unit

0.81

0.70, 0.95

Relapse

 MINI

RDQ

0.071

1 unit

0.98

0.96, 1.00

 

HAMD-17

0.007

1 unit

1.21

1.05, 1.39

Composite remission status

 QIDS-SR + SDS + EQ-5D

RDQ

0.553

1 unit

0.99

0.96, 1.02

 HAMD-17 + SOFAS

RDQ

0.374

1 unit

0.99

0.97, 1.01

Functioning

 HAMD-17

SDS

0.789

No impairment

1.09

0.57, 2.09

 

HAMD-17

0.017

1 unit

0.81

0.69, 0.96

 HAMD-17

SOFAS

0.917

Good functioning

1.03

0.55, 1.95

 

HAMD-17

0.024

1 unit

0.83

0.71, 0.98

Healthcare resource utilizationa

 Healthcare resources

RDQ

0.568

Remission

0.89

0.59, 1.33

  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, EQ-5D EuroQol, HAMD-17 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, MINI mini-International neuropsychiatric interview, QIDS-SR quick inventory of depressive symptomatology-self report, RDQ remission from depression questionnaire, SDS Sheehan disability scale, SOFAS social and occupational functioning assessment scale
  2. aHealthcare Resource Utilization was coded as a categorical outcome with at least one visit receiving a ‘Yes’