Skip to main content

Table 2 GEE for binomial models with CESD cut-off of 16 and 23

From: Changes in depressive symptoms and correlates in HIV+ people at An Hoa Clinic in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

 

Model 1 - CESD (<16/≥16)

Model 2 - CESD (<23/≥23)

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Time 2 vs. Time 1

1.15

(0.86, 1.53)

1.60

(1.13, 2.24)**

Age

 (18–30) vs. (31–40)

0.87

(0.43, 1.72)

0.63

(0.32, 1.24)

 (18–30) vs. (41–59)

0.72

(0.24, 2.22)

0.38

(0.14, 1.06)

 (31–40) vs. (41–59)

0.83

(0.30, 2.33)

0.60

(0.28, 1.30)

Female vs. Male

1.06

(0.60, 1.88)

1.21

(0.70, 2.11)

Kinh people vs. others

0.72

(0.33, 1.54)

0.69

(0.38, 1.28)

Below vs. Above grade 10

1.32

(0.76, 2.26)

1.11

(0.62, 1.99)

Religion (Yes vs. No)

0.80

(0.38, 1.69)

1.01

(0.46, 2.19)

Live with spouse vs. not

1.02

(0.64, 1.64)

1.10

(0.69, 1.75)

Individual income status

 Regular vs. irregular

1.08

(0.58, 2.04)

0.63

(0.34, 1.20)

 Regular vs. no income

0.84

(0.41, 1.72)

0.57

(0.29, 1.10)

 Irregular vs. no income

0.78

(0.35, 1.72)

0.89

(0.46, 1.72)

Household economy (Not economically disadvantaged vs. disadvantaged)

0.69

(0.45, 1.04)

0.90

(0.55, 1.48)

Co-morbidity (Yes vs. No)

1.76

(1.15, 2.70)*

1.23

(0.77, 1.98)

Social relationship (one unit difference)

0.76

(0.69, 0.82)***

0.73

(0.66, 0.81)***

Adherence (Yes vs. No)

0.73

(0.47, 1.16)

0.69

(0.44, 1.09)

  1. Note: the models included all covariates
  2. Probability of having depression was modeled *p < 0.05;**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
  3. OR odds ratio, CESD the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale, GEE Generalized Estimating Equations