Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline predictors of stage of recovery (n = 397)

From: Recovery and decision-making involvement in people with severe mental illness from six countries: a prospective observational study

 

B

SE

Wald

Sig.

Threshold

    

 STORI T0 = 1

−2.75

1.02

7.32

.01

 STORI T0 = 2

−1.59

1.01

2.49

.12

Coefficients

    

 Centre (vs Zurich)

Ulm

.24

.29

.68

.41

London

.21

.48

.19

.67

Naples

−1.03

.37

7.80

.01

Debrecen

−.23

.35

.45

.50

Aalborg

.13

.34

.14

.71

Age

.01

.01

.82

.37

Gender (female vs. male)

−.42

.18

5.56

.02

Ethnicity (white vs. not)

−.49

.53

.86

.35

Years in school

.08

.04

3.76

.05

Married (yes vs. no)

.68

.29

5.56

.02

Living situation (alone vs other)

.68

.27

6.50

.01

Living situation (with parents vs other)

.86

.32

7.27

.01

Work status (employed vs not)

.31

.25

1.63

.20

State benefits (no vs. yes)

−.42

.27

2.46

.12

Duration of Illness

.00

.01

.07

.79

GAF

.01

.01

1.61

.21

HAS-P total

.10

.04

5.25

.02

OQ-45

Interpersonal relations

−.10

.02

37.65

.00

Social role

−.08

.02

14.74

.00

CDMS

Participation

−.14

.15

1.41

.24

Information

.02

.13

.02

.90

CDIS-P (vs Passive)

Shared

.13

.19

.44

.51

Active

.41

.25

2.61

.11

  1. Pseudo R2 = 0.40
  2. Abbreviations: STORI stages of recovery inventory, GAF Global Assessment of Functioning, HAS Helping Alliance Scale, OQ-45 outcome questionnaire, CDMS Clinical Decision Making Style Scale, CDIS Clinical Decision-Making Involvement and Satisfaction
  3. Bold = p < 0.05