Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Percentages of individual statements indicating the presence of IGMIPS interaction categories and corresponding significance ratings

From: Using video-annotation software to identify interactions in group therapies for schizophrenia: assessing reliability and associations with outcomes

IGMIPS Category IMPROVERS NO-CHANGERS
First session Last session First session Last session
Self 64.9 (19.1) 74.0 (9.47) 78.2 (14.7) 74.2 (16.2)
Others 8.30 (6.47) 9.04 (7.55) 8.71 (9.23) 12.6 (14.9)
Therapist 26.4 (18.65) 21.7 (14.8) 14.7 (15.6) 12.6 (12.9)
Impersonal Abstract 23.2 (23.1) 17.2 (14.7) 11.6 (13.9) 13.3 (9.61)
Humor 14.6 (7.84) 18.2 (18.7) 12.3 (10.8) 21.8 (19.1)
Self-initiated 55.0 (15.6) 46.7 (9.38) 25.0 (28.70 30.2 (20.6)
Personal Information 19.1 (13.2) 26.3 (17.9) 19.5 (13.2) 28.0 (19.0)
Significance rating 2.39 (0.92) 2.01 (0.39) 2.49 (0.90) 2.17 (0.83)
Positive 32.3 (13.7) 44.7 (9.66) 32.7 (19.2) 55.4 (17.1)
Significance 2.39 (0.69) 2.43 (0.35) 2.84 (0.77) 2.47 (0.54)
Negative 16.0 (12.3) 12.5 (13.0) 14.7 (13.2) 20.4 (17.4)
Significance rating 1.69 (0.66) 1.71 (0.35) 1.62 (0.87) 1.70 (0.51)
Connected 4.54 (5.37) 8.17 (9.99) 6.47 (6.66) 10.2 (7.04)
Disconnected 0.53 (1.59) 0.96 (1.63) 0.00 3.70 (6.93)
Self-aware 16.6 (10.3) 22.9 (13.3) 14.6 (12.37) 26.4 (19.9)
Significance rating 1.39 (0.32) 1.45 (0.23) 1.23 (0.33) 1.24 (0.19)
Unaware 3.24 (5.12) 2.77 (3.27) 2.84 (4.25) 2.20 (4.25)
Significance rating 1.05 (0.10) 1.08 (0.14) 1.00 (0.00) 1.25 (0.35)
Sensitivity 5.03 (5.77) 2.32 (3.79) 1.39 (2.58) 1.81 (3.37)
Significance rating 1.30 (0.67) 1.24 (0.19) 1.25 (0.35) 1.38 (0.18)
Insensitivity 1.89 (3.19) 2.36 (3.40) 3.14 (6.55) 2.02 (5.70)
Significance rating 1.00 (0.00) 1.00 (0.00) 1.00 (0.00) 1.1 (N/A)
Asked questions 28.3 (19.0) 20.5 (14.1) 10.8 (14.4) 12.8 (17.4)
Enhanced awareness 2.35 (3.15) 5.60 (8.08) 0.00 1.34 (2.50)
Significance rating 1.5 (1.00) 1.30 (0.45) N/A 1.00 (0.00)
Gave advice 8.94 (8.52) 6.87 (8.29) 1.22 (2.28) 3.28 (6.05)