Using video-annotation software to identify interactions in group therapies for schizophrenia: assessing reliability and associations with outcomes

Table 5 Summary of logistic regressions exploring the relationship between the frequency of interactive behaviors and improver-status

IGMIPS Category	First session				Last session
IGMIPS Category	Odds Ratio	SE	P value	95% CI	Odds Ratio	SE	P value	95% CI
Discusses self	0.95	0.03	0.131	0.88, 1.06	1.00	0.04	0.980	0.92, 1.10
Discusses others	0.99	0.07	0.910	0.87, 1.13	0.97	0.04	0.515	0.89, 1.06
Discusses therapist	1.04	0.03	0.181	0.98, 1.11	1.05	0.04	0.196	0.97, 1.14
Discusses impersonal/abstract	1.04	0.03	0.244	0.97, 1.10	1.03	0.04	0.519	0.94, 1.12
Uses humor	1.03	0.06	0.591	0.92, 1.15	0.99	0.03	0.678	0.94, 1.04
Self-initiated	1.06	0.03	0.046	1.00, 1.13	1.08	0.05	0.083	0.99, 1.18
Personal Information	0.98	0.05	0.643	0.88, 1.08	0.99	0.03	0.693	0.93, 1.05
Positive sentiment	0.95	0.05	0.265	0.86, 1.04	0.93	0.04	0.147	0.85, 1.02
Negative sentiment	1.01	0.04	0.862	0.93, 1.09	0.92	0.05	0.101	0.82, 1.02
Demonstrates connection	0.94	0.08	0.493	0.79, 1.12	0.97	0.06	0.624	0.86, 1.09
Demonstrates disconnection	N/A^a				0.84	0.16	0.350	0.58, 1.22
Demonstrates self-awareness	0.97	0.06	0.625	0.87, 1.09	0.95	0.04	0.211	0.87, 1.03
Demonstrates un-awareness	1.07	0.18	0.679	0.77, 1.48	0.77	0.21	0.336	0.45, 1.32
Demonstrates sensitivity to others	1.34	0.42	0.361	0.72, 2.50	0.79	0.50	0.496	0.40, 1.57
Demonstrates insensitivity to others	0.98	0.13	0.891	0.76, 1.27	0.01	2.58	0.996	0
Asks question	1.06	0.04	0.067	1.00, 1.14	1.04	0.04	0.310	0.97, 1.11
Enhances awareness to others	N/A^a				1.10	0.17	0.523	0.81, 1.50
Gives advice	1.42	0.27	0.067	1.00, 2.07	1.08	0.09	0.323	0.92, 1.27

^aN/A – no statements made by participants in the no-changer category were rated as ‘disconnection’ or ‘enhanced awareness’ in the first session, therefore logistic regressions were not possible for these IGMIPS categories. SE standard error, CI confidence interval

ISSN: 1471-244X