| Sub-study name | Evaluation design | Unit of analysis | Number | Number at each time point | Number in each cluster at each time point | Detectable differences | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome, QPR | Secondary outcome, WEMWBS | Secondary outcome, INSPIRE | |||||||
cRCT (quantitative data) | Stream 1 (primary analysis) | cross-sectional cRCT (complete step-wedge) | Consumers (mail-out) | 756 | 252 at baseline 252 at step 1 252 at step 2 | 18 | 6.34 (medium effect) | NA | NA |
Stream 2 | pre- and post-intervention (incomplete step-wedge) | Consumers (interviews) | 252 (stream 1 subset) | 63 at baseline 126 at step 1 63 at step 2 | 9 | 7.68 (medium effect) | 4.80 (medium effect) | 7.72 (medium effect) | |
Stream 3 | longitudinal, (same participant, 12-mths apart pre- and post-intervention) | Consumers with diagnosis of psychosis (interviews) | 88 (stream 2 subset) | 44 at baseline & step 1 44 at step 1 & step 2 | 6–7 | 10.94 (medium-large effect) | 6.84 (medium-large effect) | 11.28 (medium-large effect) | |
Nested Qualitative study (qualitative data) | Consumers Staff | 20–24 20–24 | 10–12 at step 1 10–12 at step 2 | Nested sub-study examining qualitative data collected in study interviews and focus groups | |||||
Nested Process evaluation (both quantitative & qualitative data) | Consumers & staff | The process evaluation assesses a specific set of qualitative, quantitative and documentary data relating to each cluster. |