Mental health training programmes for non-mental health trained professionals coming into contact with people with mental ill health: a systematic review of effectiveness
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pascale Esch|
|30 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jessica Magidson|
|9 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Booth|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart Thomas|
|30 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony O"Brien|
|9 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Alison Booth|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|25 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12888-017-1356-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.