Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The comparative effectiveness and efficiency of cognitive behaviour therapy and generic counselling in the treatment of depression: evidence from the 2nd UK National Audit of psychological therapies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bruce Wampold
14 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kate Cavanagh
18 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zachary Easton Imel
3 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Joanne Pybis
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bruce Wampold
9 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Joanne Pybis
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bruce Wampold
22 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Joanne Pybis
Resubmission - Version 4
22 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 May 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12888-017-1370-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement