A prospective, quantitative study of mental health act assessments in England following the 2007 amendments to the 1983 act: did the changes fulfill their promise?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steve R. Kisely|
|4 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Segal|
|18 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gavin Davidson|
|15 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Swaran P Singh|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Swaran P Singh|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12888-017-1391-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.