Skip to main content

Table 4 Significant linear regression coefficients of stages of change predicting IIP symptomatology at the end of therapy

From: Increasing the treatment motivation of patients with somatic symptom disorder: applying the URICA-S scale

      

95% CI

 
 

B

SE B

β

t

p

Lower bound

Upper bound

R2

Model 1: Maintenance t1

.68

 Constant

.08

.12

 

.71

.48

−.15

.32

 

 IIP baseline

.85

.08

.75

10.53

<.001

.69

1.01

 

 Maintenance t1

.09

.04

.17

2.33

.023

.01

.17

 

Model 2: Maintenance t2

.66

 Constant

.00

.15

 

.01

.996

−.30

.30

 

 IIP baseline

.88

.09

.76

9.67

<.001

.70

1.07

 

 Maintenance t2

.09

.04

.17

2.18

.034

.01

.18

 

Model 3: Maintenance t3

.64

 Constant

.11

.16

 

.68

.501

−.21

.43

 

 IIP baseline

.86

.10

.76

8.78

<.001

.66

1.05

 

 Maintenance t3

.07

.04

.15

1.75

.087

−.01

.16

 
  1. t1/t2/t3 = at baseline/after 8th therapy session/ end of therapy. Model 1 / Model 2 / Model 3 = significant stages of change predictors at baseline/8th/last therapy session for IIP at the end of therapy.
  2. IIP Inventory of Interpersonal Problems
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us