This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Experiences of antipsychotic use in patients with early psychosis: a two-year follow-up study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 31 January 2017
Accepted: 6 July 2017
Published: 22 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kenneth Subotnik|
|21 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Pierre|
|25 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shannon Hughes|
|26 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Rafal Yeisen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shannon Hughes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12888-017-1425-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.