Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of mixed-effects regression models for primary and secondary outcomes

From: Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial

  

b

se

p

95%-CI

n

EPAS - total

Intercept

3.27

0.06

<0.001

3.15

-

3.39

511

 

IC

−0.10

0.07

0.406

−0.20

-

0.07

 

Time

0.07

0.01

<0.001

0.05

-

0.09

 

IC x Time

0.02

0.01

0.258

0.00

-

0.04

 

PS

0.23

0.12

0.054

0.00

-

0.47

 

EPAS - daily living

Intercept

3.33

0.07

<0.001

3.20

-

3.47

511

 

IC

0.00

0.08

0.934

−0.20

-

0.14

 

Time

0.06

0.01

<0.001

0.04

-

0.09

 

IC x Time

0.00

0.02

0.91

0.00

-

0.03

 

PS

0.44

0.13

<0.001

0.18

-

0.69

 

EPAS - social relationships and sexuality

Intercept

3.03

0.07

<0.001

2.89

-

3.17

511

 

IC

0.00

0.08

0.838

−0.20

-

0.14

 

Time

0.07

0.01

<0.001

0.05

-

0.09

 

IC x Time

0.00

0.02

0.725

0.00

-

0.03

 

PS

0.26

0.14

0.061

0.00

-

0.53

 

EPAS - psychiatric treatment participation

Intercept

3.71

0.07

<0.001

3.58

-

3.85

511

 

IC

−0.20

0.07

0.026

−0.30

-

0.00

 

Time

0.04

0.01

0.005

0.01

-

0.06

 

IC x Time

0.06

0.02

0.001

0.02

-

0.09

 

PS

0.01

0.13

0.928

−0.20

-

0.26

 

EPAS - hope and self-efficacy

Intercept

3.02

0.08

<0.001

2.86

-

3.18

511

 

IC

0.00

0.09

0.751

−0.20

-

0.14

 

Time

0.10

0.01

<0.001

0.07

-

0.13

 

IC x Time

0.01

0.02

0.698

0.00

-

0.05

 

PS

0.19

0.15

0.227

−0.10

-

0.49

 

EPAS - self-esteem

Intercept

3.23

0.08

<0.001

3.07

-

3.39

511

 

IC

−0.10

0.09

0.417

−0.20

-

0.10

 

Time

0.07

0.01

<0.001

0.05

-

0.10

 

IC x Time

0.02

0.02

0.352

0.00

-

0.05

 

PS

0.31

0.15

0.045

0.01

-

0.61

 

EPAS - empowerment at work

Intercept

3.53

0.12

<0.001

3.30

-

3.76

358

 

IC

0.12

0.13

0.328

−0.10

-

0.37

 

Time

0.09

0.03

<0.001

0.04

-

0.14

 

IC x Time

0.01

0.03

0.826

−0.10

-

0.07

 

PS

−0.40

0.19

0.046

−0.80

-

0.00

 

EPAS - parenting of minor children

Intercept

3.80

0.18

<0.001

3.45

-

4.16

122

 

IC

−0.20

0.18

0.299

−0.50

-

0.17

 

Time

0.00

0.04

0.991

−0.10

-

0.07

 

IC x Time

0.06

0.05

0.194

0.00

-

0.15

 

PS

−0.10

0.30

0.875

−0.60

-

0.55

 

HoNOS - total

Intercept

11.40

0.54

<.001

10.30

-

12.40

511

 

IC

0.74

0.58

0.2

−0.40

-

1.88

 

Time

−0.30

0.11

0.013

−0.50

-

−0.10

 

IC x Time

−0.30

0.16

0.108

−0.60

-

0.06

 

PS

−1.80

0.97

0.071

−3.70

-

0.15

 

CAN - needs

Intercept

6.61

0.25

<.001

6.11

-

7.10

511

 

IC

0.00

0.28

0.996

−0.60

-

0.55

 

Time

−0.50

0.05

<.001

−0.60

-

−0.40

 

IC x Time

0.09

0.07

0.217

−0.10

-

0.23

 

PS

−3.00

0.44

<.001

−3.80

-

−2.10

 

CAN - proportion of met needs

Intercept

0.60

0.03

<.001

0.55

-

0.66

511

 

IC

0.00

0.04

0.329

−0.10

-

0.03

 

Time

0.05

0.01

<.001

0.03

-

0.07

 

IC x Time

0.01

0.01

0.621

0.00

-

0.03

 

PS

−0.10

0.05

0.314

−0.10

-

0.04

 

CSQ-8 satisfaction score

Intercept

24.80

0.43

<.001

23.90

-

25.60

511

IC

−0.30

0.47

0.467

−1.30

-

0.58

 

Time

0.42

0.09

<.001

0.24

-

0.61

 

IC x Time

0.27

0.13

0.039

0.01

-

0.53

 

PS

−1.10

0.76

0.136

−2.60

-

0.36

 
  1. IC = mean difference between TAU and NWpG-IC group at baseline
  2. Time = linear change from t0 to t3 in TAU group
  3. IC x Time = difference in linear change between TAU and NWpG-IC group
  4. PS = estimated coefficient for propensity-score adjustment
  5. No entry in boldface without significance (p < 0.05) was identified.