Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of mixed-effects regression models for primary and secondary outcomes

From: Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial

   b se p 95%-CI n
EPAS - total Intercept 3.27 0.06 <0.001 3.15 - 3.39 511
  IC −0.10 0.07 0.406 −0.20 - 0.07  
Time 0.07 0.01 <0.001 0.05 - 0.09  
IC x Time 0.02 0.01 0.258 0.00 - 0.04  
PS 0.23 0.12 0.054 0.00 - 0.47  
EPAS - daily living Intercept 3.33 0.07 <0.001 3.20 - 3.47 511
  IC 0.00 0.08 0.934 −0.20 - 0.14  
Time 0.06 0.01 <0.001 0.04 - 0.09  
IC x Time 0.00 0.02 0.91 0.00 - 0.03  
PS 0.44 0.13 <0.001 0.18 - 0.69  
EPAS - social relationships and sexuality Intercept 3.03 0.07 <0.001 2.89 - 3.17 511
  IC 0.00 0.08 0.838 −0.20 - 0.14  
Time 0.07 0.01 <0.001 0.05 - 0.09  
IC x Time 0.00 0.02 0.725 0.00 - 0.03  
PS 0.26 0.14 0.061 0.00 - 0.53  
EPAS - psychiatric treatment participation Intercept 3.71 0.07 <0.001 3.58 - 3.85 511
  IC −0.20 0.07 0.026 −0.30 - 0.00  
Time 0.04 0.01 0.005 0.01 - 0.06  
IC x Time 0.06 0.02 0.001 0.02 - 0.09  
PS 0.01 0.13 0.928 −0.20 - 0.26  
EPAS - hope and self-efficacy Intercept 3.02 0.08 <0.001 2.86 - 3.18 511
  IC 0.00 0.09 0.751 −0.20 - 0.14  
Time 0.10 0.01 <0.001 0.07 - 0.13  
IC x Time 0.01 0.02 0.698 0.00 - 0.05  
PS 0.19 0.15 0.227 −0.10 - 0.49  
EPAS - self-esteem Intercept 3.23 0.08 <0.001 3.07 - 3.39 511
  IC −0.10 0.09 0.417 −0.20 - 0.10  
Time 0.07 0.01 <0.001 0.05 - 0.10  
IC x Time 0.02 0.02 0.352 0.00 - 0.05  
PS 0.31 0.15 0.045 0.01 - 0.61  
EPAS - empowerment at work Intercept 3.53 0.12 <0.001 3.30 - 3.76 358
  IC 0.12 0.13 0.328 −0.10 - 0.37  
Time 0.09 0.03 <0.001 0.04 - 0.14  
IC x Time 0.01 0.03 0.826 −0.10 - 0.07  
PS −0.40 0.19 0.046 −0.80 - 0.00  
EPAS - parenting of minor children Intercept 3.80 0.18 <0.001 3.45 - 4.16 122
  IC −0.20 0.18 0.299 −0.50 - 0.17  
Time 0.00 0.04 0.991 −0.10 - 0.07  
IC x Time 0.06 0.05 0.194 0.00 - 0.15  
PS −0.10 0.30 0.875 −0.60 - 0.55  
HoNOS - total Intercept 11.40 0.54 <.001 10.30 - 12.40 511
  IC 0.74 0.58 0.2 −0.40 - 1.88  
Time −0.30 0.11 0.013 −0.50 - −0.10  
IC x Time −0.30 0.16 0.108 −0.60 - 0.06  
PS −1.80 0.97 0.071 −3.70 - 0.15  
CAN - needs Intercept 6.61 0.25 <.001 6.11 - 7.10 511
  IC 0.00 0.28 0.996 −0.60 - 0.55  
Time −0.50 0.05 <.001 −0.60 - −0.40  
IC x Time 0.09 0.07 0.217 −0.10 - 0.23  
PS −3.00 0.44 <.001 −3.80 - −2.10  
CAN - proportion of met needs Intercept 0.60 0.03 <.001 0.55 - 0.66 511
  IC 0.00 0.04 0.329 −0.10 - 0.03  
Time 0.05 0.01 <.001 0.03 - 0.07  
IC x Time 0.01 0.01 0.621 0.00 - 0.03  
PS −0.10 0.05 0.314 −0.10 - 0.04  
CSQ-8 satisfaction score Intercept 24.80 0.43 <.001 23.90 - 25.60 511
IC −0.30 0.47 0.467 −1.30 - 0.58  
Time 0.42 0.09 <.001 0.24 - 0.61  
IC x Time 0.27 0.13 0.039 0.01 - 0.53  
PS −1.10 0.76 0.136 −2.60 - 0.36  
  1. IC = mean difference between TAU and NWpG-IC group at baseline
  2. Time = linear change from t0 to t3 in TAU group
  3. IC x Time = difference in linear change between TAU and NWpG-IC group
  4. PS = estimated coefficient for propensity-score adjustment
  5. No entry in boldface without significance (p < 0.05) was identified.