Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Utility of the PHQ-9 to identify major depressive disorder in adult patients in Spanish primary care centres

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Sommer
16 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erik Vindbjerg
21 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zahra Goodarzi
26 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Roger Muñoz-Navarro
Resubmission - Version 2
26 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Sommer
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erik Vindbjerg
30 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Roger Muñoz-Navarro
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Roger Muñoz-Navarro
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Roger Muñoz-Navarro
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12888-017-1450-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement