This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Effectiveness of Balancing Everyday Life (BEL) versus standard occupational therapy for activity engagement and functioning among people with mental illness – a cluster RCT study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 2 March 2017
Accepted: 29 October 2017
Published: 9 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Bressington|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frank Kruisdijk|
|9 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mona Eklund|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Bressington|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|9 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12888-017-1524-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.