This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Operationalization of diagnostic criteria of DSM-5 somatic symptom disorders
- Nana Xiong†1,
- Yaoyin Zhang†2,
- Jing Wei1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Rainer Leonhart3,
- Kurt Fritzsche4,
- Ricarda Mewes5,
- Xia Hong1,
- Jinya Cao1,
- Tao Li1,
- Jing Jiang1,
- Xudong Zhao6,
- Lan Zhang7 and
- Rainer Schaefert8
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 June 2017
Accepted: 31 October 2017
Published: 7 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nana XIONG|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gabriele Sani|
|1 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edward Shorter|
|2 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nana XIONG|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edward Shorter|
|26 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nana XIONG|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|7 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12888-017-1526-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.