Skip to main content

Table 2 Client characteristics at baseline (N = 263)

From: How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial

 

Intervention (N = 152)

Control (N = 111)

Characteristic

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Mean Age (SD)

50.76 (14.29)

49.36 (13.25)

Male

98

65

72

65

Having a partner

18

12

19

17

Nationality

Born in the Netherlands

129

85

95

86

Other

23

15

16

14

Type of carea

Sheltered living

125

83

65

59

Supported independent living

26

17

46

41

Work situation

Paid work

4

3

5

5

Sheltered work

11

7

12

11

No work

82

54

66

60

Voluntary work

40

26

24

22

Retired

11

7

3

3

Amount of supporta

>daily

97

69

47

47

>weekly

25

18

30

30

once a week

10

7

21

21

<weekly

8

6

2

2

Primary outcomes

M (SD)

M (SD)

Quality of life (N = 262)

4.08 (.70)

3.93 (.67)

Social functioning (N = 263)

112.13 (24.76)

109.57 (23.21)

Personal recovery (N = 262)

3.52 (.55)

3.41 (.48)

Secondary outcomes

M (SD)

M (SD)

Hope (N = 262)

2.91 (0.38)

2.84 (.38)

Empowerment (N = 242)

3.64 (0.48)

3.60 (.49)

Self-efficacy (N = 240)

4.41 (0.91)

4.36 (.76)

Needs (N = 254)

Unmet needs

3.95 (3.16)

4.45 (2.83)

Met needs

8.34 (3.16)

7.80 (3.22)

No needs

14.53 (3.33)

14.59 (3.42)

Covariates

M (SD)

M (SD)

BSI (N = 257)

.71 (.62)

0.82 (.63)

RPRS (N = 230)

3.49 (.61)

3.62 (.53)

  1. atype of facility and amount of support differed significantly (p < .001) between the groups. On other variables, the groups did not differ significantly