Skip to main content

Table 4 Mixed modeling analysis testing the effect of the CARe methodology on primary outcomes

From: How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial

  Quality of life Personal recovery Social functioning
ICC teama .030 .007 .284
ICC participants .602 .652 .673
Model Test P 95%CI Test P 95%CI Test P 95%CI
Time F = 22.37 .00   F = 2.87 .06   F = 2.05 .13  
T1 B = .04 .45 −.07–.15 B = .03 .44 −.04–.10 B = .38 .80 −2.53-3.30
T2 B = .51 .00 .35–.66 B = .12 .02 .02–.22 B = 4.22 .05. .01–8.42
Intervention B = .06 .52 −.14–.27 B = .09 .10 −.02–.20 B = 4.67 .07 −.32–9.66
Intervention x timeb Χ2 = 4.46 .11   Χ2 = 1.28 .53   Χ2 = 4.64 .10  
Covariatesc
Age B = .00 .18 .00–.01 B = .00 .92 −.00–.00 B = −.96 .00 −1.13--.78
Gender B = .08 .31 −.08–.25 B = −.08 .17 −.20–.03 B = 5.23 .05 −.07–10.53
Partner B = .06 .51 −.11–.22 B = .09 .12 −.02–.21 B = 5.4 .03 .50–10.37
Symptoms B = −.55 .00 −.66--.44 B = −.31 .00 −.39--.24 B = −9.72 .00 −13.06—6.39
Amount of support B = −.01 .79 −.09–.07 B = −.01 .64 −.07–.04 B = 4.70 .00 2.29–7.11
Recovery knowledge team B = −.20 .29 −.58–.17 B = −.10 .44 −.34–.15 B = −11.28 .03 −21.64--.93
Recovery promoting relationship B = .33 .00 .21–.44 B = .24 .00 .16–.32 B = 4.71 .01 1.22–8.19
  1. aIntra-Class Correlation for team and participants
  2. bEffect of the intervention. The chi-square values are values of the deviance or likelihood ratio test
  3. cThe effects of the included covariates