How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial

Table 4 Mixed modeling analysis testing the effect of the CARe methodology on primary outcomes

	Quality of life			Personal recovery				Social functioning
ICC team^a	.030			.007				.284
ICC participants	.602			.652				.673
Model	Test	P	95%CI	Test	P	95%CI		Test	P	95%CI
Time	F = 22.37	.00		F = 2.87	.06			F = 2.05	.13
T1	B = .04	.45	−.07–.15	B = .03	.44	−.04–.10		B = .38	.80	−2.53-3.30
T2	B = .51	.00	.35–.66	B = .12	.02	.02–.22		B = 4.22	.05.	.01–8.42
Intervention	B = .06	.52	−.14–.27	B = .09	.10	−.02–.20		B = 4.67	.07	−.32–9.66
Intervention x time^b	Χ² = 4.46	.11		Χ² = 1.28	.53			Χ² = 4.64	.10
Covariates^c
Age	B = .00	.18	.00–.01	B = .00	.92	−.00–.00	B = −.96	.00	−1.13--.78
Gender	B = .08	.31	−.08–.25	B = −.08	.17	−.20–.03	B = 5.23	.05	−.07–10.53
Partner	B = .06	.51	−.11–.22	B = .09	.12	−.02–.21	B = 5.4	.03	.50–10.37
Symptoms	B = −.55	.00	−.66--.44	B = −.31	.00	−.39--.24	B = −9.72	.00	−13.06—6.39
Amount of support	B = −.01	.79	−.09–.07	B = −.01	.64	−.07–.04	B = 4.70	.00	2.29–7.11
Recovery knowledge team	B = −.20	.29	−.58–.17	B = −.10	.44	−.34–.15	B = −11.28	.03	−21.64--.93
Recovery promoting relationship	B = .33	.00	.21–.44	B = .24	.00	.16–.32	B = 4.71	.01	1.22–8.19

^aIntra-Class Correlation for team and participants
^bEffect of the intervention. The chi-square values are values of the deviance or likelihood ratio test
^cThe effects of the included covariates

ISSN: 1471-244X