Improving risk prediction accuracy for new soldiers in the U.S. Army by adding self-report survey data to administrative data
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Oct 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marijn Lijffijt|
|5 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernice Pescosolido|
|17 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johan Siqveland|
|17 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Samantha Bernecker|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Feb 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Samantha Bernecker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Feb 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Mar 2018||Editorially accepted|
|3 Apr 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12888-018-1656-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.