Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the main RCT sample, outcomes and care received

From: How is a specialist depression service effective for persistent moderate to severe depressive disorder?: a qualitative study of service user experience

 

TAU

SDS

(n = 94)

(n = 93)

Age, mean (sd,)

46 (11.3)

47 (11.6)

Gender, female, n (%)

60 (64)

54 (58)

Employment status, n (%)

[n = 91]

[n = 90]

 Full-time employment

22 (26)

17 (19)

 Other employmenta

11 (12)

10 (11)

 Retired

10 (11)

16 (18)

 Unemployed

37 (41)

36 (40)

 Married or co-habiting, n (%)

50 (53)

42 (45)

 Years since first diagnosis of depression mean (sd)

16.9 (11.6)

16.5 (11.1)

 Depressed > 1 year, n (%)

82 (87)

80 (86)

 HDRS17, baseline mean (sd)

23.2 (5.8)

22.0 (4.5)

 6 month mean (95% CI) drop

−3.76(−5.45, −2.07)

−4.77(−6.32, − 3.22)

 12 month mean (95% CI) drop

−4.99(− 7.04, − 2.94)

−7.44(− 8.98, − 5.90)

 18 month mean (95% CI drop)*

−6.00(− 8.13, − 3.87)

−8.96(− 10.64, − 7.28)

 GAF, baseline mean (sd)

47.7 (9.4)

49.3 (6.8)

 6 month mean (95% CI) gain

4.61(1.51, 7.70)

5.93(3.08, 8.79)

 12 month mean (95% CI) gain

5.14(1.99, 8.28)

9.26(6.31, 12.21)

 18 month mean (95% CI) gain**

5.60(2.17, 9.03)

9.42(6.53, 12.31)

Median (range) number of appointments

 With psychiatrist, 0–18 months

8 (0–45)

17 (0–92)

 With psychotherapist, 0–18 month

4.5 (0–49)

18 (0–67)

  1. HDRS17 17 item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
  2. GAF Global Assessment of Function
  3. *SDS significantly more effective than TAU p = 0.015
  4. **SDS non-significantly more effective than TAU, p = 0.113
  5. SDS = Specialist Depression Service; TAU = treatment as usual
  6. aOther employment: part-time, sheltered and voluntary employment and higher education