Skip to main content

Table 1 Scores on the ROM State-of-Mind questionnaire (clinicians)

From: The development and evaluation of a computerized decision aid for the treatment of psychotic disorders

Subscale

Items

Mean Score (SD)

Acceptance

2. I use ROM-Phamous results in the treatment of my patients.

4,00 (0,63)

22. I actively use the information offered by ROM-Phamous.

3,00 (0,63)

Support

1. I express my concerns about ROM.

3,00 (1,27)

21. I tell people that it’s good that ROM-Phamous exists.

3,50 (1,52)

Power

13. I experience ROM-Phamous as a form of behavioural control.

1,67 (0,52)

18. Because of ROM-Phamous I have more control over my job.

2,83 (0,75)

Emotion

5. Use of ROM-Phamous fits with my professional values and beliefs.

4,00 (0,89)

6. Use of ROM-Phamous fits with good clinical care.

4,67 (0,52)

7. I am proud that ROM-Phamous is used in my institution.

3,67 (0,82)

8. I am worried about the existence of ROM-Phamous.

2,17 (1,47)

Ease of use

3. ROM-Phamous results are easy to interpret.

3,00 (0,89)

9. ROM-Phamous is easy to use.

2,83 (0,75)

10. Working with ROM-Phamous requires little (extra) mental effort.

2,67 (0,82)

Usefulness

4. ROM-Phamous adds value to the treatment of my patients.

4,33 (0,52)

11. Because of ROM-Phamous I am better able to perform my job.

3,67 (0,82)

12. Because of ROM-Phamous I am better supported in my job.

4,17 (0,75)

15. The instruments of the ROM-Phamous protocol provide me with enough valuable information about my patients.

3,83 (0,41)

16. ROM-Phamous identifies care needs.

4,00 (0,63)

17. Because of ROM-Phamous more thought goes into care modules.

3,50 (0,55)

Facilitating conditions

14. I have enough time to use ROM-Phamous in my daily work.

2,00 (0,63)

19. Because of ROM-Phamous I am able to work more efficiently.

3,50 (0,55)

20. Using ROM-Phamous costs extra time.

3,50 (0,84)

  1. 1 = completely disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = completely agree, − = no opinion