Skip to main content

Table 1 Scores on the ROM State-of-Mind questionnaire (clinicians)

From: The development and evaluation of a computerized decision aid for the treatment of psychotic disorders

Subscale Items Mean Score (SD)
Acceptance 2. I use ROM-Phamous results in the treatment of my patients. 4,00 (0,63)
22. I actively use the information offered by ROM-Phamous. 3,00 (0,63)
Support 1. I express my concerns about ROM. 3,00 (1,27)
21. I tell people that it’s good that ROM-Phamous exists. 3,50 (1,52)
Power 13. I experience ROM-Phamous as a form of behavioural control. 1,67 (0,52)
18. Because of ROM-Phamous I have more control over my job. 2,83 (0,75)
Emotion 5. Use of ROM-Phamous fits with my professional values and beliefs. 4,00 (0,89)
6. Use of ROM-Phamous fits with good clinical care. 4,67 (0,52)
7. I am proud that ROM-Phamous is used in my institution. 3,67 (0,82)
8. I am worried about the existence of ROM-Phamous. 2,17 (1,47)
Ease of use 3. ROM-Phamous results are easy to interpret. 3,00 (0,89)
9. ROM-Phamous is easy to use. 2,83 (0,75)
10. Working with ROM-Phamous requires little (extra) mental effort. 2,67 (0,82)
Usefulness 4. ROM-Phamous adds value to the treatment of my patients. 4,33 (0,52)
11. Because of ROM-Phamous I am better able to perform my job. 3,67 (0,82)
12. Because of ROM-Phamous I am better supported in my job. 4,17 (0,75)
15. The instruments of the ROM-Phamous protocol provide me with enough valuable information about my patients. 3,83 (0,41)
16. ROM-Phamous identifies care needs. 4,00 (0,63)
17. Because of ROM-Phamous more thought goes into care modules. 3,50 (0,55)
Facilitating conditions 14. I have enough time to use ROM-Phamous in my daily work. 2,00 (0,63)
19. Because of ROM-Phamous I am able to work more efficiently. 3,50 (0,55)
20. Using ROM-Phamous costs extra time. 3,50 (0,84)
  1. 1 = completely disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = completely agree, − = no opinion