Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
30 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - L. Qui
3 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - J. Tijmstra
5 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Quintana
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - J. Tijmstra
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 May 2018 Editorially accepted
7 Jun 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.