Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Jan 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Mar 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - L. Qui|
|3 Apr 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J. Tijmstra|
|5 Apr 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Quintana|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Apr 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Apr 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J. Tijmstra|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 May 2018||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jun 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.