Treatment results for severe psychiatric illness: which method is best suited to denote the outcome of mental health care?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Boehnke|
|14 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Edwin de Beurs|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernd Puschner|
|30 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Boehnke|
|21 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Edwin de Beurs|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jun 2018||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jul 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12888-018-1798-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.