Skip to main content

Table 3 Cost-effectiveness analysis and sensitivity analysis with flourishing as health outcome

From: Towards sustainable mental health promotion: trial-based health-economic evaluation of a positive psychology intervention versus usual care

Flourishing

Total sample

Alternative scenarios

  

A

B

C

Costs, €a

239

196

617

223

Effect

0.19

0.19

0.19

0.20

ICER, €b

1245

1058

3240

1099

Distribution on the cost-effectiveness plane

    

1st quadrant (northeast)

92

86

100

89

2nd quadrant (inferior: northwest)

0

0

0

0

3rd quadrant (southwest)

0

0

0

0

4th quadrant (superior: southeast)

8

14

0

11

WTP ceiling, %

    

€ 0

12

18

4

14

€ 10,000

93

92

91

93

€ 20,000

97

97

96

97

€ 30,000

100

100

100

100

  1. Scenario A = adjustment of the per participant intervention costs, based on actual costs for counseling (the number of extensive emails sent by each participant multiplied by €17); scenario B = intervention costs raised from €222 to €600; scenario C = completers only analysis (n = 112 intervention group and n = 125 control group)
  2. aCosts per ‘disease-free’ year (i.e. one year in flourishing mental health) at 2014 prices
  3. bBootstrapped median, which is the 50th percentile of 2500 replications of the ICER