Skip to main content

Table 3 Predictors of youth-ACT

From: Factors associated with treatment intensification in child and adolescent psychiatry: a cross-sectional study

Level of predictors

Univariable model1

Multivariable model2

n3

OR4 (95% CI5)

P-value

n

OR (95% CI)

P-value6

Child8

   

225

  

 HoNOSCA7

246

1.29 (1.21–1.38)

<.001

 

1.27 (1.18–1.37)

<.001

 CANSAS7

243

1.06 (1.00–1.12)

0.034

 

0.93 (0.87–1.01)

0.051

 Kidscreen7

228

0.94 (0.92–0.97)

<.001

 

0.97 (0.95–1.00)

0.213

 Age

246

     

 4–11 years old

93

     

 12–18 years old

153

2.24 (1.32–3.80)

0.003

 

1.41 (0.71–2.81)

0.322

Parent9

   

238

  

 HoNOS7

244

1.22 (1.15–1.30)

<.001

 

1.22 (1.10–1.35)

<.001

 CANSAS7

246

1.12 (1.07–1.12)

<.001

 

0.99 (0.92–1.06)

0.802

 MANSA7

240

0.93 (0.91–0.96)

<.001

 

1.01 (0.97–1.06)

0.568

 Parental stress

245

1.53 (1.34–1.76)

<.001

 

1.42 (1.21–1.67)

0.002

 Lack of knowledge pertaining to difficulties

246

1.66 (1.30–2.13)

<.001

 

1.60 (1.19–2.15)

0.003

Family and social context10

   

243

  

Living situation

243

     

Two parents

160

     

Single parent

83

2.05 (1.19–3.42)

0.009

 

1.30 (0.67–2.55)

0.437

Domestic violence

245

12.05 (6.20–23.42)

<.001

 

11.27 (5.56–22.86)

<.001

Financial problems

243

1.32 (1.11–1.56)

0.015

 

1.06 (0.86–1.31)

0.593

Ethnic background primary caregiver

246

     

Dutch

236

     

Other

10

0.46 (0.23–0.92)

0.029

 

0.40 (0.18–0.91)

0.028

Social support

243

0.52 (0.23–1.18)

0.118

   

Educational status

246

     

Basic

39

     

Intermediate

74

1.65 (0.75–3.63)

0.210

   

High

133

0.69 (0.34–1.41)

0.312

   

Number of children

245

0.99 (0.76–1.30)

0.965

   
  1. 1Univariable: binary logistic analyses of each candidate predictor preformed separately
  2. 2Multivariable: binary logistic regression analysis of the predictors that were significant in the univariable analysis, performed simultaneously
  3. 3n number of patients
  4. 4OR Odds Ratio
  5. 5CI Confidence interval
  6. 6P-value< 0.10 is considered statistically significant
  7. 7Sum-score
  8. 8Child-level: Omnibus test, Step P = 0.00, Model P = < 0.00, Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.68, Nagelkerke R2=0.43, AUC = 0.84, 95% CI 0.78–0.89, P < 0.001
  9. 9Parent-level: Omnibus test, Step P = 0.00, Model P = < 0.00, Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.91, Nagelkerke R2=0.45, AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.80–0.89, P < 0.001
  10. 10Family-social context-level: Omnibus test, Step P = 0.00, Model P = < 0.00, Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = 0.58, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.36, AUC = 0.78, 95% CI 0.72–0.84, P < 0.001
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us