Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality Review of 26 studies

From: The impact of immigration detention on mental health: a systematic review

 Quality Question 1-7

Study

Clear focus on question

Appropriate design

Appropriate sampling method

Appropriate sample

Tolerable level of non-participation

Exposure (detention) appropriately addressed

Outcomes (mental health symptoms and disorders) appropriately addressed

Brabeck & Xu [59]

High

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Intermediate

Low

Cleveland & Rousseau [38]

High

High

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

High

High

Coffey et al. [40]

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

High

Cohen [50]

Intermediate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Intermediate

Intermediate

Cwikel et al. [37]

High

High

Low

Intermediate

Low

High

High

Graf et al. [47]

High

High

High

Intermediate

Low

High

High

Green & Eagar [36]

High

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

High

High

Intermediate

Hedrick [49]

High

High

High

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Ichikawa et al. [41]

High

High

High

High

High

High

High

Keller et al. [44]

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

High

High

High

High

Lorek et al. [52]

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Low

High

Intermediate

Mares [54]

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Intermediate

Low

High

High

Mares & Jureidini [53]

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

Momartin et al. [51]

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

High

High

Puthoopparambil et al. (2009)

High

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

High

Robjant et al. [11]

High

High

Intermediate

High

High

High

High

Rojas-Flores, L. [57]

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Low

Intermediate

High

Rothe et al. [55]

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

Low

Low

High

Intermediate

Rothe et al. [56]

High

High

Low

Low

Low

High

High

Sen et al. [45]

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

High

Sobhanian et al. [42]

High

Intermediate

Low

Intermediate

Low

High

High

Steel et al. [23]

High

High

High

Intermediate

High

High

Intermediate

Steel et al. [43]

High

High

High

Intermediate

High

High

High

Steel et al. (2011)

High

High

High

High

High

High

High

Young & Gordon [48]

High

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

Zwi et al. [58]

High

High

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

High

High

 Quality Question 8-13

Study

Consideration of cofounders

Appropriate conduction of statistical analyses

Reporting of confidence intervals

Consideration of ethical issues

Adequate support for conclusions

Generalisability of findings

Total Score

Brabeck & Xu [59]

High

High

High

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

19/26

Cleveland & Rousseau [38]

High

High

High

High

High

High

24/26

Coffey et al. [40]

Low

High

High

High

High

Intermediate

20/26

Cohen [50]

Low

Low

Low

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

7/26

Cwikel et al. [37]

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

18/26

Graf et al. [47]

Low

High

Low

High

High

High

19/26

Green & Eagar [36]

High

High

High

Intermediate

High

High

22/26

Hedrick [49]

Intermediate

High

Low

Intermediate

High

High

19/26

Ichikawa et al. [41]

High

High

High

High

High

Intermediate

25/26

Keller et al. [44]

High

High

High

High

High

High

23/26

Lorek et al. [52]

Intermediate

Low

Low

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

14/26

Mares [54]

Low

High

Low

High

High

Intermediate

16/26

Mares & Jureidini [53]

Low

Intermediate

Low

Low

High

Intermediate

14/26

Momartin et al. [51]

High

High

High

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

22/26

Puthoopparambil et al. [46]

High

High

High

High

High

High

24/26

Robjant et al. [11]

High

High

High

High

High

High

25/26

Rojas-Flores, L. [57]

High

High

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

18/26

Rothe et al. (2002a)

Low

Low

Low

Low

High

Low

9/26

Rothe et al. (2002b)

High

High

Low

Intermediate

High

Low

15/26

Sen et al. [45]

Intermediate

High

Low

High

High

High

19/26

Sobhanian et al. [42]

High

High

Low

Intermediate

High

High

15/26

Steel et al. [23]

Intermediate

Intermediate

Low

High

High

Intermediate

19/26

Steel et al. [43]

High

High

Intermediate

High

High

Intermediate

23/26

Steel et al. [39]

Intermediate

Intermediate

High

High

High

Intermediate

24/26

Young & Gordon [48]

Low

High

Low

Intermediate

High

Intermediate

17/26

Zwi et al. [58]

Intermediate

High

High

Intermediate

High

High

22/26