Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Adjusted logistic regression analysis of treatment recommendations

From: Understanding the public’s profile of mental health literacy in China: a nationwide study

Panel A: Situation Will Not Improve On Its Own (N = 1620) OR (95% CI)
Model 1   Model 2    Model 3   Model 4  
Age (<=35 vs. 36–64) 0.91 (0.72, 1.16)   0.91 (0.71, 1.16) 0.94 (0.73, 1.2) 0.93 (0.73, 1.2)
Age (> = 65 vs. 36–64) 1.13 (0.84, 1.51)   1.12 (0.83, 1.5) 1.09 (0.81, 1.47) 1.1 (0.82, 1.48)
Male (1) 1.05 (0.85, 1.29)   1.05 (0.85, 1.29) 1.06 (0.86, 1.3) 1.06 (0.86, 1.3)
Urban (1) 1.33 (1.07, 1.65)*   1.28 (1.03, 1.59)* 1.29 (1.04, 1.6)* 1.32 (1.06, 1.64)*
Exact Recognition+ (1)    1.81 (1.41, 2.32)* 1.82 (1.42, 2.34)* 1.71 (1.33, 2.21)*
Illness Explanation-Biological/Genetic Cause (1)    1.26 (1.01, 1.57)* 1.22 (0.97, 1.52)
Perceived Illness Severity     1.36 (1.17, 1.58)*
Panel B: Importance of Specific Providers
Variable Importance of Medical Doctor Importance of Psychiatrist Importance of Mental Health Professional
ß (95% CI)a ß (95% CI)b ß (95% CI)c
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Age (<=35 vs. 36–64) −0.45 (−0.76, −0.14)* − 0.44 (− 0.76, − 0.13)* − 0.34 (− 0.65, − 0.03)* − 0.34 (− 0.65, − 0.03) * − 0.45 (− 0.82, − 0.09)* − 0.47 (− 0.83, − 0.1) * −0.39 (− 0.76, − 0.02) * −0.4 (− 0.77, − 0.04) * 0.02 (− 0.28, 0.32) 0.01 (− 0.28, 0.31) −0.04 (− 0.34, 0.25) −0.05 (− 0.34, 0.24)
Age (> = 65 vs. 36–64) 0.3 (− 0.09, 0.68) 0.31 (− 0.07, 0.69) 0.24 (− 0.14, 0.62) 0.24 (− 0.14, 0.62) 0.3 (− 0.16, 0.75) 0.27 (− 0.18, 0.72) 0.21 (−0.24, 0.66) 0.25 (− 0.2, 0.69) −0.48 (− 0.85, − 0.1)* −0.51 (− 0.88, − 0.14) * −0.47 (− 0.84, − 0.1) * −0.42 (− 0.78, − 0.06) *
Male (1) −0.27 (− 0.54, − 0.01)* −0.27 (− 0.53, 0)* −0.24 (− 0.5, 0.02) −0.24 (− 0.5, 0.02) 0.08 (− 0.23, 0.4) 0.08 (− 0.23, 0.39) 0.1 (− 0.21, 0.41) 0.1 (− 0.2, 0.41) 0.06 (− 0.2, 0.31) 0.05 (−0.2, 0.31) 0.04 (− 0.21, 0.29) 0.04 (− 0.2, 0.29)
Urban (1) 0.01 (− 0.27, 0.29) 0.06 (− 0.22, 0.34) 0.07 (− 0.21, 0.35) 0.07 (− 0.21, 0.35) 0.07 (− 0.27, 0.4) −0.02 (− 0.35, 0.32) −0.01 (− 0.34, 0.33) 0.03 (− 0.3, 0.36) 0.49 (0.21, 0.76)* 0.4 (0.13, 0.67) * 0.39 (0.12, 0.66) * 0.42 (0.16, 0.69) *
Exact Recognition+ (1)   −0.66 (− 1, − 0.33)* −0.65 (− 0.98, − 0.31) * −0.65 (− 0.99, − 0.32) *   1.14 (0.75, 1.53) * 1.15 (0.76, 1.54) * 0.99 (0.6, 1.38) *   1.24 (0.92, 1.55) * 1.23 (0.91, 1.55) * 1.07 (0.76, 1.39) *
Illness Explanation-Biological/Genetic Cause (1)    0.75 (0.48, 1.03) * 0.75 (0.47, 1.03) *    0.54 (0.21, 0.87) * 0.45 (0.12, 0.78) *    −0.39 (−0.65, − 0.12) * −0.47 (− 0.74, − 0.21) *
Perceived Illness Severity     0.02 (−0.17, 0.21)     0.71 (0.49, 0.93) *     0.68 (0.51, 0.86) *
  1. Note. N number of subjects, CI Confidence interval, OR odds ratio, ß beta coefficient; *p < 0.05
  2. +Model using some MI recognition were conducted and no difference between exact and some recognition were observed
  3. aPopulation size (N) = 1671, R2 = 0.041; b Population size (N) = 1649, R2 = 0.056; c Population size (N) = 1655, R2 = 0.081