Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included CPGs

From: Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: a scoping review

Authors

Abreviation

Year

Country

Involvement of patients or their representatives

Methodology used to reach recommendations

Methodology used for grading the strength of recommendations

Use of minimally important difference

Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT)

CANMAT

2016

Canada

No

CANMAT methodology

CANMAT

No

Depression Guideline Development Group (Acupuncture CPG)

Acupuncture CPG

2015

China

No

GRADE methodology

GRADE

No

National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)

NICE

2018

United Kingdom

Part of the guideline development group. Does not explicitly state what they did.

GRADE methodology

GRADE

Yes, they discuss the clinical importance of the effects, but a cut-off point is not clearly stated

Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Galicia (GuiaSalud)

GuiaSalud

2014

Spain

External validation of guideline

SIGN methodology

SIGN

Yes, they discuss the clinical importance of the effects, but a cut-off point is not clearly stated

American College of Physicians (ACP)

ACP

2016

United States of America

No

Expert consensus

ACP’s GRADE modification

Yes, they discuss the clinical importance of the effects, but a cut-off point is not clearly stated

American Psychiatric Association (APA)

APA

2010

United States of America

No

Expert consensus

APA (appears to be an expert consensus=

No

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists

RANZCP

2018

Australia New Zealand

No

Not clear

Adaptation of NHMRC

No

US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement (US-Task Force)

USTF

2016

United States of America

No

Not clear.

USPSTF

Yes, they discuss the clinical importance of the effects, cut-off points are stated (eg. PHQ-9)

Management of Major Depressive Disorder Working Group (VA/DoD)

VADoD

2016

United States of America

No

Expert consensus

GRADE

No

Korean Guideline Development Team for Depression

Korea

2014

Republic of Korea

No

Not clear

SIGN plus their modifications

No

British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP)

BAP

2015

United Kingdom

No

Expert consensus

BAP criteria

Yes. They state the cut-off points for each effect size measure.