Table 2 Outcomes of the methodological appraisal
From: A systematic review of palliative care tools and interventions for people with severe mental illness
| Â | Burton, 2016 [56] | Foti, 2005 [57] | Foti, 2005 [58] | Smits, 2015 [59] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Abstract & title | Poor 2 | Fair 3 | Fair 3 | Poor 2 |
Introduction & aims | Fair 3 | Good 4 | Good 4 | Poor 2 |
Method & data | Fair 3 | Fair 3 | Fair 3 | Poor 2 |
Sampling | Poor 2 | Good 4 | Fair 3 | Poor 2 |
Data analysis | Poor 2 | Fair 3 | Good 4 | Very poor 1 |
Ethics & bias | Very poor 1 | Very poor 1 | Very poor 1 | Very poor 1 |
Results & findings | Fair 3 | Fair 3 | Fair 3 | Poor 2 |
Transferability & generalizability | Poor 2 | Good 4 | Good 4 | Fair 3 |
Implications | Poor 2 | Fair 3 | Fair 3 | Fair 3 |
Total score/ quality | 20 ‘Fair’ | 28 ‘Good’ | 28 ‘Good’ | 18 ‘Poor’ |