| |
Model 1 (n = 331)
|
Model 2 (n = 171)
|
Model 3 (n = 171)
|
Model 4 (n = 215)
|
Model 5 (n = 215)
|
|---|
|
Secure attachment score
|
−1.9** [−2.5, − 1.2]
|
− 2.0** [− 2.9, − 1.1]
|
− 1.2† [− 2.3, 0.022]
|
−2.0** [− 2.8, − 1.2]
|
−2.0** [− 3.2, − 0.85]
|
|
Father’s visitation a
| |
1.5† [− 0.27, 3.3]
|
1.3 [− 0.47, 3.1]
| | |
|
Secure attachment score x Father’s visitation
| | |
−1.8† [−3.6, 0.045]
| | |
|
Mother’s visitation a
| | | |
−0.73 [−2.3, 0.84]
|
−0.78 [−2.3, 0.78]
|
|
Secure attachment score x Mother’s visitation
| | | | |
0.19 [−1.39, 1.77]
|
- Coefficient and 95% confidence interval are shown. *: p < 0.05; †: p < 0.1
- A mixed effects regression analysis with s random effects model was used to account for multiple individuals in each institution controlling for age, gender, frequency of maltreatment, and social support from care workers. Models 2 and 3 additionally controlled for social support from the father, while Models 4 and 5 controlled for social support from mother
- Each model was conducted among participants who have parent(s) to test the impact of visitation
- aOnly includes biological parents. Each model included the respective visiting persons regardless of other visiting persons
