Open Peer Review Reports for: Misleading about MBT in Oslo
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Mar 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacek Gierus |
| 25 Apr 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christian Brettschneider |
| 2 May 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Sigmund Karterud |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 2 May 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 May 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Sigmund Karterud |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 May 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Jun 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Jul 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12888-019-2193-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
