Skip to main content

Table 7 Confirmatory Factor Analysis for the total sample, and for the three study samples separately

From: Cultural differences in positive psychotic experiences assessed with the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-42 (CAPE-42): a comparison of student populations in the Netherlands, Nigeria and Norway

CAPE-Pos frequency

 

Absolute goodness of fit

Comparative fit

χ2a,b

dfc

p

RMSEAd (90% CI)

CFId

SRMR

AICb

BICb,e

Factor loadings

Whole sample (n = 786)f

 1-factor modelg

677

152

<  0.001

0.082 (0.075; 0.088)

0.824

0.060*

29,905

29,962

0.307–0.681

 3-factor modelh

459

149

<  0.001

0.063 (0.056; 0.069)*

0.898

0.050*

29,566

29,627

0.316–0.786

 5-factor modeli

320

142

<  0.001

0.048 (0.041; 0.056)*

0.942*

0.041*

29,372

29,443

0.348–0.904

Dutch sample (n = 245)f

 1-factor modelg

344

152

<  0.001

0.082 (0.071; 0.094)

0.573

0.085

4035

4048

0.029–0.541

 3-factor modelh

317

149

<  0.001

0.074 (0.063; 0.086)*

0.656

0.083

3973

3987

0.278–0.679

 5-factor modeli

218

142

<  0.001

0.051 (0.037; 0.064)*

0.845

0.068*

3868

3884

0.299–0.988

Nigerian sample (n = 380)f

 1-factor modelg

407

152

<  0.001

0.073 (0.064; 0.081)*

0.742

0.070*

16,591

16,620

0.103–0.580

 3-factor modelh

314

149

<  0.001

0.059 (0.049; 0.068)*

0.836

0.063*

16,478

16,510

0.143–0.728

 5-factor modeli

254

142

<  0.001

0.050 (0.040; 0.059)*

0.888

0.053*

16,423

16,460

0.217–0.737

Norwegian sample (n = 161)f

 1-factor modelg

359

152

<  0.001

0.100 (0.087; 0.114)

0.455

0.103

3904

3901

0.095–0.533

 3-factor modelh

316

149

<  0.001

0.087 (0.074; 0.100)

0.600

0.094

3825

3822

0.185–0.944

 5-factor modeli

301

142

<  0.001

0.086 (0.072; 0.099)

0.626

0.091

3816

3812

0.211–0.971

  1. aYuan-Bentler scaled test-statistic, bRounded to nearest integer, cItem no. 41 dropped, due to (near-)zero variance in Dutch and Norwegian samples (i.e. [virtually] all scores = 1), dRobust RMSEA and CFI from the scaled test-statistic, eSample size adjusted Bayesian BIC, fMissing data points were processed using listwise deletion, gCAPE-Pos one-factor structure as originally reported by [67], hCAPE-Pos three-factor structure as reported by [25], iCAPE-Pos five-factor structure as reported by [26], *Meeting minimally acceptable fit criteria: CFI ≥ 0.90 [75], RMSEA ≤ 0.08 [76], SRMR ≤ 0.08 [77]