Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A test of the goodness of fit of the generic metacognitive model of psychopathology symptoms

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Henrik Nordahl
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcantonio Spada
21 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lora Capobianco
23 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Henrik Nordahl
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcantonio Spada
21 Aug 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lora Capobianco
22 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Henrik Nordahl
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Henrik Nordahl
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
18 Sep 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12888-019-2266-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement