Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate multinomial logistic regression analyses of the association between self-harm status and pre-motivational/motivational phase factors (adjusted for age, gender, depressive symptoms)

From: Differentiating adults who think about self-harm from those who engage in self-harm: the role of volitional alcohol factors

 

Self-harm status

OR

CI

P

Pre-motivational/Motivational factors

Perceived stress

  No self-harm enaction or ideation

Self-harm ideation

1.10

1.04–1.17

0.002

  No self-harm enaction or ideation

Self-harm enaction

1.12

1.06–1.19

< 0.001

  Self-harm ideation

Self-harm enaction

1.02

0.95–1.09

0.584

Support

  No self-harm enaction or ideation

Self-harm ideation

0.90

0.82–0.98

0.019

  No self-harm enaction or ideation

Self-harm enaction

0.84

0.77–0.92

< 0.001

  Self-harm ideation

Self-harm enaction

0.94

0.85–1.04

0.208

NMR expectancies

  No self-harm enaction or ideation

Self-harm ideation

0.97

0.96–0.98

< 0.001

  No self-harm enaction or ideation

Self-harm enaction

0.97

0.96–0.98

< 0.001

  Self-harm ideation

Self-harm enaction

1.00

0.99–1.01

0.441

Optimism

  No self-harm enaction or ideation

Self-harm ideation

0.83

0.69–1.00

0.053

  No self-harm enaction or ideation

Self-harm enaction

0.75

0.62–0.90

0.002

  Self-harm ideation

Self-harm enaction

0.90

0.73–1.10

0.299

  1. OR Odds ratio, CI 95% Confidence intervals
  2. All statistically significant comparisons remain statistically significant after applying Holm’s sequential Bonferroni correction
  3. NMR expectancies: Generalised Expectancies for Negative Mood Regulation scale