Skip to main content

Table 3 Hierarchical regression analysis: explicit attachment dimensions predicting symptom levels of depression and quality of life

From: Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression

Measure

B

SE B

β

p

sr2

a) ECR-subscales centered predicting QIDS at post-treatment

 Step 1

  Constant

−.89

2.41

 

.71

 

  QIDS pre-treatment

.56

.16

.39

.001

.39

 Step 2

  Constant

−2.24

2.32

 

.34

 

  QIDS pre-treatment

.64

.16

.45

<.001

.44

  ECR-anxiety

−.02

.04

−.05

.67

−.05

  ECR-avoidance

.13

.04

.39

.001

.38

 Step 3

  Constant

−2.16

2.35

 

.36

 

  QIDS pre-treatment

.64

.16

.45

<.001

.43

  ECR-anxiety

−.02

.04

−.06

.61

−.05

  ECR-avoidance

.13

.04

.39

.001

.37

  Interaction between ECR-anxiety and ECR-avoidance

.00

.00

.04

.73

.04

b) ECR-subscales centered predicting EUROHIS at post-treatment

 Step 1

  Constant

12.89

2.75

 

<.001

 

  EUROHIS pre-treatment

.61

.13

.51

<.001

.51

 Step 2

  Constant

12.46

2.82

 

<.001

 

  EUROHIS pre-treatment

.63

.13

.53

<.001

.51

  ECR-anxiety

.01

.03

.03

.76

.03

  ECR-avoidance

−.04

.03

−.13

.23

−.13

 Step 3

  Constant

12.44

2.84

 

<.001

 

  EUROHIS pre-treatment

.63

.13

.53

<.001

.51

  ECR-anxiety

.01

.03

.02

.86

.02

  ECR-avoidance

−.04

.03

−.14

.22

−.14

  Interaction between ECR-anxiety and ECR-avoidance

.00

.00

.05

.65

.05

  1. Note: a) R2 = .16 for step 1 (p = .001); ΔR2 = .15 for step 2 (p = 0.02); ΔR2 = .00 for step 3 (p = 0.73); b) R2 = .26 for step 1 (p < 0.001; ΔR2 = .02 for step 2 (p = .48); ΔR2 = .00 for step 3 (p = .65). QIDS Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology, EUROHIS European Health Interview Surveys Quality of Life Scale, ECR Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire. Significant p-values (p < .05) are marked in bold