Skip to main content

Table 1 Kappa in CCRT Reliability Studies

From: Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure

Study

Sample

Source of Relational episodes

Reliability

Crits-Christoph et al. (1988) [11]

35 adult patients

Therapy sessions

W: Kw = 0.61

RO: Kw = 0.70

RS: Kw = 0.61

Luborsky et al. (1995) [24]

Mean values in 6 studies

Therapy sessions

Reported dreams

RAP interviews

W: Kw = 0.63

RO: Kw = 0.66

RS: Kw = 0.69

Zander et al. (1995) [25]

6 nonclinical volunteers

RAP interview

W: K = 0.35

RO: K = 0.41

RS: K = 0.46

Luborsky et al. (2004) [26]

2 patients, 16 scorers, 11 inexperienced

Defined relational episodes

Kw = 0.70 experienced

Kw = 0.58 inexperienced

Hegarty et al. (2019) [27]

20 patients with depression

Therapy sessions

W: K = 0.55

RO: K = 0.61

RS: K = 0.57

  1. Notes: W Wishes, RO Response from Others, RS Response from Self. Some results are presented as weighted kappa, others as kappa due to type of scoring in the study. Kw Weighted kappa. K Kappa [24,25,26,27]