Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between the unfair acceptance rates of the two groups and related factors

From: The fair decision-making of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder from the perspective of dual-process theories

 

HF-ASD

TD

r

P

r

P

Age

−0.31

0.09

0.23

0.17

IQ

−0.28

0.13

0.22

0.19

 Inhibit

−0.22

0.23

0.10

0.54

 Shift

−0.34

0.06

−0.03

0.84

 Emotional control

−0.30

0.10

−0.08

0.64

 BRI

−0.36

0.049**

0.01

0.94

 Initiate

−0.15

0.42

−0.00

0.98

 Working memory

−0.07

0.72

−0.21

0.22

 Plan/Organize

0.10

0.69

−0.12

0.49

 Organization of materials

−0.11

0.54

0.00

1.00

 Monitor

0.02

0.92

0.12

0.467

 MI

−0.03

0.86

−0.05

0.77

 GEC

−0.19

0.30

0.01

0.97

 GEM-C

0.05

0.80

−0.36

0.03**

 GEM-A

−0.07

0.70

0.02

0.90

 GEM

−0.02

0.92

−0.17

0.31

  1. BRIEF Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function; BRI Behavioral Regulation Index; MI Metacognition Index; GEC Global Executive Composite; GEM-PR Griffith Empathy Measure—Parent Report; GEM-C Cognitive Empathy; GEM-A Affective Empathy; **indicates p < 0.05, *** indicates p < 0.001
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us