Skip to main content

Table 1 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Peer-Reviewed Literature

From: The effects of emergency medical service work on the psychological, physical, and social well-being of ambulance personnel: a systematic review of qualitative research

Inclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Paramedic/Emergency Medical Service EMS)-based populations including the following roles and terms: paramedic, ambulance personnel, community paramedic, intensive care paramedic, emergency medical technician, emergency medical personnel, emergency dispatch personnel, emergency call-takers, ambulance volunteers, out-of-hospital or pre-hospital paramedic

Not specific to paramedic/EMS-based populations; focused on other ESFR populations (fire, police, state emergency services)

Studies focus on undergraduates studying to become Ambulance personnel

Emergency service first responder (ESFR) studies in which data for paramedic populations is clearly articulated and distinguish from other ESFR populations

Not available in the English language

Interventions related to mental health, psychological wellbeing, work related stress, physical health

Published prior to 2000

Outcomes related to mental health, psychological wellbeing, work related stress, physical health

Non-peer-reviewed literature

Published in the English language

Editorials, opinion pieces

Systematic reviews (provided they reported at least one qualitative study)

Quantitative data only reported

Published January 1st 2000–2018

Based on a single incident (e.g. disaster, terrorism) or focused on a specific case type/patient cohort (e.g. children, end-of-life care, CPR performance, Ebola, forensic)

Peer-reviewed literature

Reported an empirical study

Other identified reviews (e.g., narrative, scoping, rapid)

Used qualitative data collection methods (for all, or some, components of the research)