TDF THEMES | BARRIERS | ENABLERS |
---|---|---|
DEFICITS IN PRACTITIONERS’ KNOWLEDGE | • Service centred drivers for the use of GSH-T | • Patient preference-driven approach to GSH-T (access, flexibility) |
• Lack of use of different modalities to deliver GSH | • Balance on the use of different modalities of delivery | |
• Positive experience on telephone assessment facilitates telephone treatment | ||
SUB-OPTIMAL PRACTITIONER TELEPHONE SKILLS | • Lack of telephone specific skills | • Developing verbal communication skills to deliver GSH-T through telephone specific training |
• Lack of quality assessment and monitoring on telephone delivery before and after becoming qualified | • Developing a warm and safe therapeutic environment | |
• Moving to a positive attitude through practice, changes in negative beliefs and growth in self-confidence | ||
PRACTITIONERS’ LACK OF BELIEFS IN TELEPHONE CAPABILITIES & SELF-CONFIDENCE | • Feeling less capable to develop a therapeutic relationship over the telephone compared to face-to-face | |
• Lack of self-confidence to work over the telephone related to the lack of visual and non-verbal cues | • Lack of visual increases sense of control over patient’s perceptions | |
PRACTITIONERS’ NEGATIVE BELIEFS ABOUT CONSEQUENCES | • Lack of effectiveness of telephone delivery regardless of the evidence | • Effectiveness of telephone delivery grounded on the evidence, practice and experience |
• Drop-out rates perceived to be higher for GSH-T (related to lack of patient engagement) | • Lack of visual helps to focus on patient’s verbal responses and increases efficiency | |
NEGATIVE EMOTIONS | • Feeling anxious and out of the comfort zone working over the telephone | |
• Feeling like a ‘robot’ working over the telephone (lack of flexibility to deliver patient-centred care) | ||
• Feeling overwhelmed, disconnected and burn out | ||
• Feeling lonely and isolated | ||
PROFESSIONAL ROLE EXPECTATIONS | • Professional role varies pending on mode of delivery: coach vs therapist | |
• Delivering GSH-T perceived as a lower version of treatment | ||
• Feelings of PWP role being undervalued | ||
• Majority of telephone work done at Step 2 care only | ||
NEGATIVE SOCIAL INFLUENCES | • Negative preconceptions about telephone treatment | • Managing patient expectations |
• Patient expectations to receive f2f treatment | ||
• Patient association of ‘therapy’ with ‘counselling’ | ||
• Practitioner’s patient perceptions of telephone being ‘not proper’ therapy | ||
• Lack of awareness of psychological treatments and its different modes of delivery | ||
CHALLENGES IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT & RESOURCES | • Working in a noisy ‘call centre’ with limited resources | • Informal peer support and supervision |
• Planning and preparation for telephone sessions is time consuming (before and after the session) | • Sessions over the telephone take less time (structure, focus, boundaries) | |
• Lack of telephone-focused guidelines and service procedures for GSH-T | • Flexible working and/or improvements in working environmental conditions | |
• Lack of formal supervision addressing challenges related to telephone delivery and telephone procedures |