Skip to main content

Table 4 Acceptability, feasibility and perceived utility of the e-decision-aid’s (DA) in the Intervention group (n = 56, T1)

From: Improving treatment decision-making in bipolar II disorder: a phase II randomised controlled trial of an online patient decision-aid

 

Agree/Somewhat Agree

Disagree/Somewhat disagree

 

n (%)

n (%)

Perceived ease of use of e-DA

 Font easy-to-use

50 (89.3)

6 (10.7)

 Easy-to-use

50 (89.3)

6 (10.7)

 Clearly organised information

51 (91.1)

5 (8.9)

 Design appealing

51 (91.1)

5 (8.9)

 Easy-to-understand information

52 (92.9)

4 (7.1)

 Colours pleasant

53 (94.6)

3 (5.4)

 Pictures pleasant

52 (92.9)

4 (7.1)

 Important information easy-to-find

46 (82.1)

10 (17.9)

Perceived usefulness of e-DA

 Content interesting

52 (92.9)

4 (7.1)

 Useful in making a treatment decision

50 (89.3)

6 (10.7)

 Right amount of information included

47 (83.9)

9 (16.1)

 Information I needed included

49 (87.5)

7 (12.5)

 Helped with my concerns

46 (82.1)

10 (17.9)

 Found links to information and other resources

47 (83.9)

9 (16.1)

 Learnt something new

46 (82.1)

10 (17.9)

 Made it easier to discuss treatment options with (my) clinician

48 (85.7)

8 (14.3)

 Made it easier to discuss treatment options with family

40 (71.4)

16 (28.6)

Attitudes towards using e-DA

 Would recommend to others in my situation

51 (91.1)

5 (8.9)

 Would go back and re-read sections

51 (91.1)

5 (8.9)

 Information did not make me anxious

47 (83.9)

9 (16.1)

Perceived trustworthiness and balance of information in e-DA

 Information trustworthy

52 (92.9)

4 (7.1)

 Information up-to-date

52 (92.9)

4 (7.1)

 Equal emphasis on each of the medication options

52 (92.9)

4 (7.1)

 Equal emphasis on each of the adjunctive psychological options

50 (89.3)

6 (10.7)

 

n (%)

 

Access of the e-DA (self-report)

 Yes, all pages/sections

10 (17.9)

–

 Yes, quite thoroughly

9 (16.1)

–

 Yes, briefly/only sections I felt relevant to me

29 (51.8)

–

 No, because… (e.g., forgot to, technical/internet problems)

9 (16.1)

–

Visits to key information pages on site (yes)

 All pages visited

16 (15.5%)

–

 >/= 50% pages visited

24 (23.3%)

–

 < 50% pages visited

63 (61.2%)

–

Use of Values Clarification Exercises

  < 1 treatment option exercise completed

79 (76.7%)

–

 1–3 treatment option exercise/s completed

19 (18.4%)

–

 All 4 treatment option exercises completed

5 (4.9%)

–