Skip to main content

Table 6 Quality of the decision-making process outcomes in the Control and Intervention groups post-treatment decision (T1) and at 3-month follow-up (T2)

From: Improving treatment decision-making in bipolar II disorder: a phase II randomised controlled trial of an online patient decision-aid

 

Post-treatment decision

(T1)

3-month follow-up (T2)

Control

Intervention

 

Control

Intervention

 
 

M (SD, n)

M (SD, n)

SMD (95% CI)

M (SD, n)

M (SD, n)

SMD (95% CI)

Decisional Conflict Scale (/100)

 Total

30.19 (20.1, 69)

23.80 (15.19, 74)

0.36 (0.30, 0.69)

–

–

–

 Uncertainty

41.91 (26.62, 69)

32.09 (20.26, 74)

0.42 (0.08, 0.08)

–

–

–

 Uninformed

28.74 (25.31, 69)

21.73 (19.84, 74)

0.31 (−0.02, 0.64)

–

–

–

 Unclear values

22.95 (20.88, 69)

18.81 (16.78, 74)

0.22 (−0.11, 0.55)

–

–

–

 Unsupported

28.99 (22.31, 69)

22.75 (16.22, 74)

0.32 (−0.01, 0.65)

–

–

–

 Effective decision

28.8 (21.89, 69)

23.65 (17.56, 74)

0.26 (−0.07, 0.59)

–

–

–

Subjective understanding of treatment (/5)

3.66 (0.84, 59)

3.84 (0.75, 66)

−0.22 (− 0.57, 0.14)

3.85 (0.67, 45)

3.93 (0.9, 38)

−0.10 (− 0.54, 0.33)

Preparation for Decision-making Scale (/100)

50.47 (28.46, 58)

62.08 (24.31, 59)

−0.44 (− 0.81, − 0.07)

–

–

–

Decisional Regret Scale (/100)

–

–

–

25.11 (22.95, 47)

17.05 (14.68, 44)

0.42 (0.01, 0.84)

 

‘yes’ n (%)

‘yes’ n (%)

OR (95% CI)

‘yes’ n (%)

‘yes’ n (%)

OR (95% CI)

Experienced preferred level of involvement in decisions (triadic)

28 (39%)

30 (38%)

0.96 (0.50,1.86)

15 (32%)

12 (33%)

1.07 (0.45, 2.55)

  1. Empty cells (−) denote outcome was not measured at that time point
  2. SMD standardised mean difference, OR odds ration, CI confidence interval