Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted associations with SCD assessed continuously via self-perceived cognitive function and SCD assessed categorically via endorsement of memory complaints (N = 491)

From: Repetitive negative thinking is associated with subjective cognitive decline in older adults: a cross-sectional study

 

Self-perceived cognitive function (standardised)

Memory complaints (binary)

 

Univariable linear regression models

Univariable logistic regression models

Explanatory variable

Coefficienta

95% CI

p-value

Odds ratiob

95% CI

p-value

Age (1 year)

0.01

−0.01 to 0.03

0.461

1.02

0.97 to 1.07

0.450

Female (vs male)

0.11

−0.07 to 0.29

0.236

0.86

0.56 to 1.32

0.494

Education (1 year)

0.02

−0.01 to 0.05

0.154

1.01

0.95 to 1.08

0.714

Repetitive negative thinking (1 SD)c

−0.52

− 0.59 to − 0.44

< 0.001

1.78

1.43 to 2.21

< 0.001

Rumination (1 SD)

−0.39

− 0.48 to − 0.31

< 0.001

1.24

1.01 to 1.52

0.036

Worry (1 SD)

−0.48

−0.56 to − 0.40

< 0.001

1.55

1.26 to 1.90

< 0.001

Purpose in life (1 SD)

0.42

0.34 to 0.50

< 0.001

0.66

0.56 to 0.84

< 0.001

Openness to experience (1 SD)

0.11

0.02 to 0.20

0.017

1.02

0.83 to 1.25

0.873

Conscientiousness (1 SD)

0.27

0.18 to 0.35

< 0.001

0.74

0.60 to 0.90

0.003

Extraversion (1 SD)

0.26

0.17 to 0.34

< 0.001

0.76

0.61 to 0.94

0.011

Agreeableness (1 SD)

0.21

0.12 to 0.29

< 0.001

0.78

0.63 to 0.96

0.017

Neuroticism (1 SD)

−0.41

−0.50 to −0.33

< 0.001

1.54

1.25 to 1.90

< 0.001

Regular meditation practice (vs no practice)

−0.22

−0.54 to 0.09

0.159

1.08

0.53 to 2.22

0.829

  1. Abbreviations: SCD subjective cognitive decline, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval
  2. aIn the univariable linear regression models, the coefficient for the standardised continuous explanatory variables (indicated in parentheses by 1 SD) is equal to the Pearson’s correlation coefficient
  3. bIn the univariable logistic regression models, for binary explanatory variables (sex, regular meditation practice), the estimate describes the odds of memory complaints in one group relative to the reference category (indicated in parentheses). For continuous explanatory variables, the estimate reflects the expected increase in the odds of memory complaints for a one unit increase in the explanatory variable
  4. cn = 490