Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic characteristics, and number of lifetime deliberate self-harm episodes by sample characteristics (n = 448)

From: Should we increase the focus on diet when considering associations between lifestyle habits and deliberate self-harm?

Characteristic

% (n)

Mean DSH episodes (SD)a

Sex

 Male

42.9 (192)

1.4 (1.9)

 Female

57.1 (256)

2.0 (2.8)**

Age

31.7 (10.6) b

−0.17**c

Marital status

 Married/de facto

15.9 (71)

1.3 (1.5)

 Single

84.2 (377)

1.8 (2.6)

Depressive Disorder

 Yes

32.8 (146)

1.8 (3.2)

 No

67.4 (302)

1.7 (2.0)

Anxiety Disorder

 Yes

10.8 (48)

1.3 (1.2)

 No

89.3 (400)

1.8 (2.6)

Substance Use Disorder

 Yes

19.2 (86)

2.0 (1.9)

 No

80.8 (362)

1.7 (2.6)

DASS depression

13.2 (5.6)b

0.11*

DASS anxiety

9.5 (5.6)b

0.05

Alcohol

 ≤2 drinks/day

75.9 (340)

1.8 (2.8)

 > 2 drinks/day

24.1 (108)

1.6 (1.4)

Abuse of prescribed or unprescribed drugs

 Seldom/never

55.8 (250)

1.5 (2.1)

 Sometimes/frequently

44.2 (198)

1.9 (2.8)

Smoker

 Never

41.3 (185)

1.3 (2.6)

 Daily or occasional use

58.7 (263)

2.0 (2.5)**

Receive emotional support

 Sometimes/often

74.6 (334)

1.6 (2.2)

 Hardly ever

25.4 (114)

2.1 (3.1)

Weight

 Within 8 kg of ideal weight

79.5 (356)

1.7 (2.7)

 Not within 8 kg of ideal weight

20.5 (92)

1.7 (1.8)

Consume excess sugar, salt, animal fats or junk food

 Never/sometimes

84.4 (378)

1.7 (2.4)

 Almost always

15.6 (70)

1.7 (2.6)

Eat breakfast

 Sometimes/often

66.7 (299)

1.6 (2.3)

 Hardly ever

33.3 (149)

1.9 (2.8)

Eat balanced meals

 Sometimes/often

79.5 (356)

1.6 (1.9)

 Hardly ever

20.5 (92)

2.3 (4.0)**

Active exercise for 30mins

 Sometimes/often

66.7 (299)

1.6 (2.6)

 Hardly ever

33.3 (149)

1.9 (2.2)

  1. astatistical significance was established by a one-way ANOVA, unless otherwise indicated. bvalues presented are mean and standard deviation. cvalues presented are pearson’s correlation coefficients (r). *p < .05, **p < .01. DASS Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. Categorical variables were analysed one-way ANOVA; continuous variables were analysed by correlation