Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of Findings for the comparison antipsychotics versus no antipsychotics: quantitative outcomes for acceptability

From: Acceptability, equity, and feasibility of using antipsychotics in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review

Antipsychotics versus no Antipsychotics for children and adolescents with ASD

Patient or Population: children and adolescents with ASD

Setting: Inpatients and Outpatients

Intervention: Antipsychotics

Control: no Antipsychotics

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effectsa (95% CI)

Relative effect (95% CI)

№ of participants (studies)

Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)

Comments

Risk with no Antipsychotics

Risk with Antipsychotics

Discontinuation due to any cause (Follow up: median 8 weeks)

244 per 1.000

149 per 1.000 (117 to 190)

RR 0.61 (0.48 to 0.78)

1124 (15 RCT) [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]

MODERATE b

Antipsychotics probably reduce the risk of dropout due to any cause

Discontinuation due to adverse events (Follow up: median 8 weeks)

39 per 1.000

39 per 1.000 (22 to 70)

RR 0.99 (0.55 to 1.79)

1010 (12 RCT) [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]

LOW a,b

Antipsychotics may result in little to no difference in the risk of dropout due to adverse events

  1. aThe risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI)
  2. CI Confidence interval, SMD Standardised mean difference, RR Risk ratio
  3. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
  4. High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
  5. Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
  6. Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
  7. Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect
  8. Explanations
  9. a. Downgraded by one level because the 95%CI for SMD goes from considerable beneficial effects to undesirable effects
  10. b. Downgraded by one level because most studies showed an unclear risk for selection bias, four studies were at high risk for attrition bias, one study was at high risk for selection bias and one study was at high risk for reporting bias
  11. References [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]