Table 3 Domains of social cognition in individuals with 22q11DS linked to other variables
Social Cognition | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author | N | Age M (SD), (range) | IQ (SD), (range) | Task | Variable | Association |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | EP | Â | Â |
Vangkilde et al. (2016) [49] | 29 | 15.7 (2.8), (−) | 79.52 (−), (35–113) | ERT | IQ | r = 0.43, p = 0.02 |
Zaharia et al. (2018) [58] | 75 | T1 12.81 (3.57), (−) | 71.96 (11.25), (−) | Face Discrimination Task | IQ | 0 |
Shashi et al. (2012) [53] | 66 | 10.5 (2.6), (−) | (−) | DANVA | IQ | 0 |
Badoud et al. (2017) [55] | 29 | 17.79 (2.89), (11–21) | 75.33 (11.66), (−) | Pictures of Facial Affect | IQ | 0 |
Vangkilde et al. (2016) [49] | 29 | 15.7 (2.8), (−) | 79.52 (−), (35–113) | ERT | age | F = 10.58, p = 0.002 |
Campbell et al. (2011) [50] | 50 | 10.99 (2.9), (6–17) | 65.8 (9.3), (40–94) | Face Process Skills Battery |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | Identity | age | beta = 0.235, p < 0.005 |
|  |  |  |  | Gaze | age | beta = 0.226, p < 0.02 |
|  |  |  |  | Facial speech | age | beta = 0.242, p < 0.03 |
Zaharia et al. (2018) [58] | 75 | T1 12.81 (3.57), (−) | 71.96 (11.25), (−) | Face Discrimination Task | age | d.r. |
Badoud et al. (2017) [55] | 29 | 17.79 (2.89), (11–21) | 75.33 (11.66), (−) | Picturres of Facial Affect | age | 0 |
Campbell et al. (2011) [50] | 50 | 10.99 (2.9), (6–17) | 65.8 (9.3), (40–94) | Face Process Skills Battery | WM | r = 0.44, p < 0.001 |
Campbell et al. (2011) [50] | 50 | 10.99 (2.9), (6–17) | 65.8 (9.3), (40–94) | Face Process Skills Battery | grammar reception | r = 0.646, p < 0.0005 |
Shashi et al. (2012) [53] | 66 | 10.5 (2.6), (−) | (−) | DANVA | EF | 0 |
Shashi et al. (2012) [53] | 66 | 10.5 (2.6), (−) | (−) | DANVA | verbal learning and memory | 0 |
Shashi et al. (2012) [53] | 66 | 10.5 (2.6), (−) | (−) | DANVA | sustained attention | 0 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | ToM | Â | Â |
Ho et al. (2012) [52] | 34 | 17.1 (1.9), (14–22) | 74.5 (13.2), (−) | The Animations Task: |  |  |
|  |  |  |  | Intentionality (SUNY) | IQ | r = 0.511, p < 0.01 |
|  |  |  |  | Appropriatedness (SUNY) | IQ | r = 0.463, p < 0.01 |
|  |  |  |  | Appropriatedness (random) | IQ | r = 0.453, p < 0.01 |
Ho et al. (2012) [52] | 29 | 13.7 (5.5), (6–25) | 80.5 (13.7), (−) | The Animations Task: |  |  |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | Intentionality (UCLA) | IQ | 0 |
| Â | Â | Â | Â | Appropriatedness (UCLA) | IQ | 0 |
Vangkilde et al. (2016) [49] | 29 | 15.7 (2.8), (−) | 79.52 (−), (35–113) | TASIT | IQ | 0 |
Badoud et al. (2017) [55] | 29 | 17.79 (2.89), (11–21) | 75.33 (11.66), (−) | The Director Task | IQ | 0 |
Campbell et al. (2011) [50] | 50 | 10.99 (2.9), (6–17) | 65.8 (9.3), (40–94) | False-belief stories | age | r = 0.61, p < 0.0005 |
Vangkilde et al. (2016) [49] | 29 | 15.7 (2.8), (−) | 79.52 (−), (35–113) | TASIT | age | r = 0.35, p = 0.07 |
Ho et al. (2012) [52] | 63 | Â | Â | The Animations Task: | Â | Â |
(SUNY) | 34 | 17.1 (1.9), (14–22) | 74.5 (13.2), (−) | Intentionality (SUNY, UCLA) | age | 0 |
(UCLA) | 29 | 13.7 (5.5), (6–25) | 80.5 (13.7), (−) | Appropriatedness (SUNY, UCLA) | age | 0 |
Badoud et al. (2017) [55] | 29 | 17.79 (2.89), (11–21) | 75.33 (11.66), (−) | The Director Task | age | 0 |
Campbell et al. (2015) [54] | 24 | 16.75 (3.14), (12–21) | 75.9 (14.9), (56–115) | PST (false-belief stories) | EF | beta = 0.44, p < 0.01 |
Campbell et al. (2011) [50] | 50 | 10.99 (2.9), (6–17) | 65.8 (9.3), (40–94) | False belief-stories | grammar reception | r = 0.347, p < 0.015 |