Factor structure and measurement invariance of the problematic mobile phone use questionnaire-short version across gender in Chinese adolescents and young adults

Table 4 Multiple fit indices for measurement invariance across gender

Model	S-Bχ²	df	CFI	TLI	RMSEA (90% CI)	SRMR	Δχ²	Δdf	P	ΔCFI	ΔTLI	ΔRMSEA	ΔSRMR
Model A	294.888	82	0.936	0.914	0.050 (0.044–0.056)	0.043	–	–	<0.01	–	–	–	–
Model B	303.730	90	0.936	0.921	0.048 (0.042–0.054)	0.044	5.960	8	0.750	0.000	0.007	0.002	0.001
Model C	334.419	98	0.929	0.920	0.048 (0.042–0.054)	0.046	32.002	8	<0.001	0.007	0.001	0.000	0.002
Model D	395.797	109	0.914	0.913	0.050 (0.045–0.056)	0.049	59.557	11	<0.001	0.015	0.007	0.002	0.003
Model _M	99.236	41	0.928	0.903	0.059 (0.044–0.074)	0.058	–	–	<0.01	–	–	–	–
Model _F	201.978	41	0.937	0.916	0.048 (0.042–0.055)	0.039	–	–	<0.01	–	–	–	–

Note: S-Bχ2 Satorra-Bentler corrected chi-square; df degrees of freedom; CFI comparative fit index; TLI Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA root mean square error of approximation; CI confidence interval; SRMR standardized root mean square residual; Δ deviation magnitude of fit indices

ISSN: 1471-244X